Another trig question relate to retarded potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Trig
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the potential of radiating dipoles as described in Griffiths' textbook. The equation for the potential is presented, highlighting conditions where d is much smaller than η and c/ω. A key point of contention is understanding why the cosine term becomes negligible when η is much larger than c/ω. The explanation provided suggests that since both sine and cosine functions are bounded by ±1, the sine term dominates, leading to the conclusion that the cosine term effectively disappears. This simplification is affirmed as a straightforward reasoning in the context of the problem.
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294
This is from Griffiths page 446.

In radiating dipoles:

V(\vec r,t)=\frac 1 {4\pi \epsilon_0} \left [ \frac {q_0 cos [\omega(t- \frac {\eta_+} c )]}{\eta_+}- \frac {q_0 cos [\omega(t- \frac {\eta_- } c)]}{\eta_-} \right ]

Given conditions d<< \eta\; and d<< \frac c {\omega} :

V_{(\eta,\theta,t)} = \frac {q_0 d cos \theta}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r} \left [ -\frac {\omega}{c} sin[\omega(t-\frac {\eta}{c}]+\frac 1 {\eta} cos[\omega(t-\frac {\eta}{c}]\right ]

But then the book claimed if \eta >> \frac c {\omega}\;, then:V_{(\eta,\theta,t)} = \frac {q_0 d cos \theta}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r} \left [ -\frac {\omega}{c} sin[ \omega(t-\frac {\eta}{c} ] \right ] = -\frac {q_0\; d\;\omega\; cos \theta}{4\pi \epsilon_0 c\; r} sin[ \omega(t-\frac {\eta}{c} ]I don't see why if \eta >> \frac c {\omega}\;, then

\frac 1 {\eta} cos[\omega(t-\frac {\eta}{c}] = 0

It look so simple but I just don't see it. Please explain to me.

Thanks

Alan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I have the answer, it is very simple if I am correct:

V_{(\eta,\theta,t)} = \frac {q_0 d cos \theta}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r} \left [ -\frac {\omega}{c} sin[\omega(t-\frac {\eta}{c}]+\frac 1 {\eta} cos[\omega(t-\frac {\eta}{c}]\right ]Since both the sine and cosine max out at +/-1, so if \eta >> \frac c {\omega}\;, then The first term with the sine function is much larger than the second term with cosine term. So the second term just disappeared. Tell me whether I am correct. It's just that simple!
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
832
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K