ANS: Forces and Angular Motion at the North Pole and Equator

In summary, the person's weight at the equator will be 579.9 N. This can be determined by subtracting the force necessary for circular motion at the equator from the 600 N force due to gravity at the North Pole. The equations to consider are F_{grav} - F_{normal} = ma = 0 at the North Pole and F_{grav} - F_{normal} = ma = m\frac{v^2}{r} at the equator, where Fnormal is the reading on the scale and v is the velocity at the equator, which can be calculated using the angular spin of the Earth around its axis times the radius.
  • #1
SS2006
80
0
Suppose the Earth is a perfect sphere with R = 6370 KM. If a person weighs exactly 600 N at the north pole, how much will the person weigh at the equator.? (Hint: The upward push of hte scale on the person is what the scale will read and is what we aer calling the weight in this case)
ANS: 579.9 N

this is on a angular motin in a plane work sheet, i got all the ones above but here I am blanked
i can't use energy equations, nor mv2/r, or can i? i don't know how ot attempt this.
or is it f = g m1 m2 / r2?
i just need a kickstart
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, you don't use energy equations, this problem has nothing to do with energy- only force. You don't NEED to use Gm1m2/r2 because you are already told that the force due to gravity is 600 N. The difference between the north pole and the equator is the centrifugal "force" at the equator so you CAN use mv2/r.
Subtract the force necessary to hold the person in circular motion at the equator from the 600 N. That will be the reading on the scale.
 
  • #3
i need more ideas
dont know how to start
are you saing
mv2/r = 600 - t?
what do i use for v2
and m
 
  • #4
The speed (v2) would be the velocity at the equator that would be the angular spin of the Earth around its axis times the radius. The mass would be the mass of the person. You can determine this from the 600N. Then just subtract the mv2/r from 600.
 
  • #5
These are the equations from the force diagram you should be contemplating for the guy at the North Pole:

[tex]F_{grav} - F_{normal} = ma = 0[/tex]

For the equator:

[tex]F_{grav} - F_{normal} = ma = m\frac{v^2}{r}[/tex]

Fnormal is the reading on your scale. Does it make sense?
 

FAQ: ANS: Forces and Angular Motion at the North Pole and Equator

What is angular motion on a plane?

Angular motion on a plane refers to the movement of an object along a curved path in two dimensions. This type of motion is characterized by an object's rotation around a fixed point or axis.

How is angular motion different from linear motion?

Angular motion involves an object moving along a curved path, while linear motion involves an object moving in a straight line. Additionally, angular motion is measured in terms of angle and time, while linear motion is measured in terms of distance and time.

What is the difference between angular displacement and angular velocity?

Angular displacement refers to the change in an object's orientation or position along a curved path, while angular velocity refers to the rate of change of angular displacement over time. In other words, angular displacement is a measure of how much an object has rotated, while angular velocity is a measure of how fast it is rotating.

How is angular acceleration calculated?

Angular acceleration is calculated by dividing the change in angular velocity by the change in time. It is typically measured in radians per second squared (rad/s^2).

What are some real-world examples of angular motion on a plane?

Some examples of angular motion on a plane include a spinning top, a Ferris wheel, a swinging pendulum, and a planet orbiting around a star. These objects all rotate around a fixed point or axis, exhibiting angular motion on a two-dimensional plane.

Similar threads

Back
Top