MHB Answer αℓєєиα♥'s Logistic Population Growth Model Q on Yahoo! Answers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on αℓєєиα♥'s question about the logistic population growth model for yeast cells, described by the function n = f(t) = a / (1 + be^(-0.9t)). The initial conditions provided are that at time t = 0, the population is 20 cells, increasing at a rate of 16 cells/hour. By solving the equations derived from these conditions, the values of the parameters are determined to be a = 180 and b = 8. In the long run, the yeast population is expected to stabilize at 180 cells. This analysis highlights the characteristics of logistic growth in a constrained environment.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
αℓєєиα♥'s question at Yahoo! Answers regarding the logistic population growth model

Here is the question:

Calculus Exponential Growth Problem?

Really hating calculus right now...

The number of yeast cells in a laboratory culture increases rapidly initially but levels off eventually. The population is modeled by the function:

n = f(t) = a / (1+be^(-0.9t))

Where t is measured in hours. At time t = 0 the population is 20 cells and is increasing at a rate of 16 cells/hour.

a) Find the values of a and b.

b) According to this model, what happens to the yeast population in the long run?

If you could explain how to do this problem that'd be great. It's just that this equation of the growth is unfamiliar.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: αℓєєиα♥'s question at Yahoo! Answers regarding the logistic population growth model

Hello αℓєєиα♥,

We are given the following function which models the population of yeast cells:

$$f(t)=\frac{a}{1+be^{-0.9t}}$$

We will need the derivative of this function, so let's compute it now:

$$f'(t)=\frac{0.9abe^{-0.9t}}{\left(1+be^{-0.9t} \right)^2}$$

Incidentally, this population model is the so-called Logistic function - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia where resources are limited and competition for these resources limits the population growth.

a) To find the values of the parameters $a$ and $b$, we may take the information provided about the initial values to get two equations in two unknowns:

$$f(0)=\frac{a}{1+be^{-0.9\cdot0}}=\frac{a}{1+b}=20$$

$$f'(0)=\frac{0.9abe^{-0.9\cdot0}}{\left(1+be^{-0.9\cdot0} \right)^2}=\frac{0.9ab}{\left(1+b \right)^2}=16$$

The first equation implies:

$$a=20(b+1)$$

Substituting this into the second equation, we find:

$$\frac{0.9\left(20(b+1) \right)b}{\left(1+b \right)^2}=16$$

$$18b(b+1)=16(b+1)^2$$

We may divide through by $b+1\ne0$ to obtain:

$$18b=16(b+1)$$

$$18b=16b+16$$

$$2b=16$$

$$b=8\implies a=20(8+1)=180$$

Hence, we have found:

$$(a,b)=(180,8)$$

b) To analyze the population in the long run, we may consider:

$$\lim_{t\to\infty}f(t)=\lim_{t\to\infty}\frac{a}{1+be^{-0.9t}}=\frac{a}{1+b\cdot0}=a=180$$

Thus, we have found the limiting number of yeast cells is 180.

Here is a plot of the population function for the first 24 hours:

View attachment 1613
 

Attachments

  • yeastpop.jpg
    yeastpop.jpg
    10.2 KB · Views: 109
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top