- #1
Pull and Twist
- 48
- 0
Here is the given problem...
View attachment 6022
And I first approached it by drawing the xy footprint to get my theta and radius limits to convert to polar.
Then I overlooked the original xy function and pretty much took the area of that footprint (highlighted in green.) That gave me a very nice number.
Later I realized that I should have converted xy into polar as well as the object is probably intended to have varying density (highlighted in red.) With that approach I got the answer 15. Also a nice clean number.
Can anyone verify that the second answer is correct or am I approaching this the wrong way?
Thanks.
View attachment 6023
And here's the footprint I drew...
View attachment 6024
View attachment 6022
And I first approached it by drawing the xy footprint to get my theta and radius limits to convert to polar.
Then I overlooked the original xy function and pretty much took the area of that footprint (highlighted in green.) That gave me a very nice number.
Later I realized that I should have converted xy into polar as well as the object is probably intended to have varying density (highlighted in red.) With that approach I got the answer 15. Also a nice clean number.
Can anyone verify that the second answer is correct or am I approaching this the wrong way?
Thanks.
View attachment 6023
And here's the footprint I drew...
View attachment 6024