Answer Lim(x->infinity)e^(-x)coshx and Lim(x->1)[(e^x-1)/In(x)]sinhx

  • MHB
  • Thread starter renyikouniao
  • Start date
In summary: No, we do not have equality. The limit from the negative side is negative infinity and the limit from the positive side is infinity, so the overall limit does not exist. Therefore, the original limit also does not exist. In summary, the limits for both expressions do not exist as x approaches 1 and infinity, respectively. The first expression has a determinate form but applying the rule multiple times does not lead to a solution. The second expression has a determinate form after rewriting it, but the overall limit does not exist due to the different one-sided limits.
  • #1
renyikouniao
41
0
Question:Determine 1.Lim(x->infinity)e^(-x)coshx
2.Lim(x->1)[(e^x-1)/In(x)]sinhx

For 1.=Lim(x->infinity)e^(-x)/(1/coshx) so the top and bottem both go to 0.then apply the rule. Repeat this procedure 3 times the top and bottem still both go to 0,so I am stuck.

2.Circumstance same as 1.I apply the rule 2 times and both the top and the bottem go to infinity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
1.) I would write the expression as:

\(\displaystyle \frac{e^x+e^{-x}}{2e^x}=\frac{1+e^{-2x}}{2}\)

Now you have a determinate form.

2.) Substituting 1 for $x$ gives you a constant divided by zero...so check the one-sided limits.
 
  • #3
MarkFL said:
1.) I would write the expression as:

\(\displaystyle \frac{e^x+e^{-x}}{2e^x}=\frac{1+e^{-2x}}{2}\)

Now you have a determinate form.

2.) Substituting 1 for $x$ gives you a constant divided by zero...so check the one-sided limits.

Thank you for the reponse.
For part 2. (e^x-1)/Inx is one part,sinhx is another part.They both go to infinity as x approches 1.
 
  • #4
\(\displaystyle \sinh(1)=\frac{e-\frac{1}{e}}{2}=\frac{e^2-1}{2e}\approx1.1752011936438014\)
 
  • #5
MarkFL said:
\(\displaystyle \sinh(1)=\frac{e-\frac{1}{e}}{2}=\frac{e^2-1}{2e}\approx1.1752011936438014\)

Thank you very much!:D How about I think it this way: (e^x-1/In(x))/(1/sinhx)
(e^x-1/In(x)) this whole thing approches negative infinity and 1/sinhx approches negative infinity as x approches 1
 
  • #6
But \(\displaystyle \lim_{x\to1}\frac{1}{\sinh(x)}\ne-\infty\)...instead we have:

\(\displaystyle \lim_{x\to1}\frac{1}{\sinh(x)}=\frac{2e}{e^2-1}\)

So we know:

\(\displaystyle \lim_{x\to1}\left(e^x-1 \right)\sinh(x)=\frac{(e-1)\left(e^2-1 \right)}{2e}\)

which is a constant, let's call it $k$, which means the original limit may be written

\(\displaystyle k\lim_{x\to1}\frac{1}{\ln(x)}\)

We know the natural log function in the denominator is approaching zero, but do we have:

\(\displaystyle \lim_{x\to1^{-}}\frac{1}{\ln(x)}=\lim_{x\to1^{+}}\frac{1}{\ln(x)}\) ?
 

FAQ: Answer Lim(x->infinity)e^(-x)coshx and Lim(x->1)[(e^x-1)/In(x)]sinhx

Question 1: What is the limit of Lim(x->infinity)e^(-x)coshx?

As x approaches infinity, the term e^(-x) decreases exponentially while coshx increases without bound. Therefore, the overall limit is 0.

Question 2: How do you evaluate Lim(x->infinity)e^(-x)coshx?

To evaluate this limit, you can use L'Hopital's rule by taking the derivative of both the numerator and denominator. This results in the limit being equal to Lim(x->infinity)-e^(-x)sinhx, which is also equal to 0.

Question 3: What is the limit of Lim(x->1)[(e^x-1)/In(x)]sinhx?

Using L'Hopital's rule again, the limit can be rewritten as Lim(x->1)coshx/cosx. As x approaches 1, coshx and cosx both approach 1, resulting in a limit of 1.

Question 4: How do you evaluate Lim(x->1)[(e^x-1)/In(x)]sinhx?

To evaluate this limit, you can use L'Hopital's rule again by taking the derivative of both the numerator and denominator. This results in the limit being equal to Lim(x->1)[(e^x)/x]cosx. As x approaches 1, e^x and x both approach 1, resulting in a limit of cos1, which is approximately 0.54.

Question 5: Are there any other methods to evaluate these limits?

Yes, in addition to using L'Hopital's rule, you can also use Taylor series expansions to evaluate these limits. However, L'Hopital's rule is typically the simpler and more efficient method.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
981
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top