Answer Root-Mean-Square Fluctuation in Box of Length L

In summary, the conversation discusses the equal probability density of finding a particle in a box of length L and the calculation of the root-mean-square fluctuation in position. After assuming normalization, the probability density is determined to be p(x) = 1/L. The correct expectation values for <x> and <x^2> are calculated using this probability density, resulting in a root-mean-square fluctuation of (L^2/3 - L/2)^1/2.
  • #1
terp.asessed
127
3

Homework Statement


There is an equal probability density for finding a particle anywhere in the box. Assume that the box is of length L.
What would the root-mean-square fluctation in position be?

Homework Equations


root-mean-square fluctation2 = <x2> - <x>2

The Attempt at a Solution


since there is an equal probability density anywhere in the box, I assumed normalization:
1 = integral (x=0 to L) p(x)dx = integral (x=0 to L) C dx
1 = C integral (x=0 to L) dx = CL
C = 1/L
probability density = p(x) = 1/L

So...from here, I got:

<x> = integral (x=0 to L) p(x) x p(x) dx = 1/L2 integral (x=0 to L) x dx = 1/2
<x2> = integral (x=0 to L) p(x) x2 p(x) dx = 1/L2 integral (x=0 to L) x2 dx = 1/2 = L/3

therefore:
root-mean-square fluctation2 = <x2> - <x>2 = L/3 - 1/2...which does not make sense at ALL--could someone point out the error I've made? I have no idea where I made a mistake because I believe the solution to be something like of one value, like 3/12 or something, not what I got...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is ##\langle x\rangle^2##, not ##\langle x\rangle## ... Also, either your normalisation is wrong or your expectation values are. You have to decide whether p(x) is the probability density or the wave-function. You have used it as the probability density when normalising but as a wave function when computing the expectation values. This results in very strange units on your resulting expectation values.
 
  • #3
root-mean-square fluctation2 = <x2> - <x>2 = L/3 - 1/4.
And, honestly, I am using p(x) as probability density--hence normalization...teacher hinted that the problem is NOT a wave...just a matter of probability density and expectation values...
 
  • #4
Then your computations of the expectation values are wrong as you are including ##p(x)^2##. The expectation value of ##f(x)## should be
$$
\langle f(x) \rangle = \int_0^L f(x) p(x) dx.
$$
 
  • Like
Likes terp.asessed
  • #5
Ok, wait--what is exactly f(x)? if p(x) is a probability density?
 
  • #6
##f(x)## is a function of ##x## that you want to know the expectation value of. In your case ##f(x) = x## and ##x^2##, respectively.
 
  • #7
wait, so, to make a loooooong story short:

<x> = integral (x=0 to L) x p(x) dx = 1/L integral (x=0 to L) x dx = L/2
<x2> = integral (x=0 to L) x2 p(x) dx = 1/L integral (x=0 to L) x2 dx = L2/3

Also, I am sorry to keep asking, but shouldn't I use normalization in this case? It seems I got wrong p(x) value?
 
  • #8
Yes, as you can see, those expressions also have the correct dimensions and the expectation for x is L/2, which is reasonable. Yes, you should use normalisation, the normalisation is p(x) = 1/L. The problem was that you squared p(x) when computing the expectation values in your first post.
 
  • Like
Likes terp.asessed
  • #9
..ok, so for <x2> = integral (x=0 to L) x2 p(x) dx = 1/L integral (x=0 to L) x2 dx = L2/3 ?
 
  • #10
Yes, so in the end, what do you get for <x^2> - <x>^2?
 
  • #11
(L2/3 - L/2)1/2 for root-mean square fluctation? Does this solution make any sense for the problem? I am sorry but I thought I wouldn't get any squared values in the solution.
 
  • #12
You are now missing the square of the expectation value of x (i.e., <x>^2). You can see that your expression does not make sense since you are trying to subtract something with units length from something with units length squared. Once you have this sorted out, you can always pull out L^2 as an L outside of the square root.
 
  • Like
Likes terp.asessed

FAQ: Answer Root-Mean-Square Fluctuation in Box of Length L

What is the formula for calculating the root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF) in a box of length L?

The formula for calculating RMSF is: RMSF = √((1/N) ∑(i=1 to N) (xi - xavg)^2), where N is the total number of particles in the box, xi is the position of the ith particle, and xavg is the average position of all particles in the box.

How is RMSF related to the temperature of the particles in the box?

RMSF is directly proportional to the temperature of the particles in the box. As the temperature increases, the particles will have more kinetic energy and therefore their positions will fluctuate more, resulting in a higher RMSF.

Can RMSF be used to measure the stability of a system?

Yes, RMSF can be used as a measure of the stability of a system. A lower RMSF indicates that the particles in the box are more tightly packed and have less fluctuation in their positions, indicating a more stable system.

How does the length of the box (L) affect the RMSF?

The length of the box (L) does not directly affect the RMSF. However, a larger box may contain more particles, which can result in a higher RMSF. Additionally, the shape of the box may also impact the RMSF.

What are the units of RMSF?

RMSF is typically measured in the same units as the length of the box (L). For example, if the box length is in nanometers, then the RMSF will also be in nanometers.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
866
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
756
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top