Anti-matter annihilation and the CMBR

In summary: With the number density decrease, the photon energy density today is a factor 1e12 lower than at CMB release.Your post is more comprehensive and helpful.In summary, the CMB is the leftover energy from the annihilation of matter and antimatter that arose during cosmic inflation. The energy of the CMB is considerably lower than the energy found in matter in the universe, because much of the energy has been lost as expansion redshifted it. The matter asymmetry of the early universe is generally agreed to be about 1 part in 10 billion based on CMB measurements. Science is based on observational evidence, not philosophy.
  • #1
Herbascious J
165
7
Recently I watched a lecture on Anti-matter and the Standard Model...

...At one point Dr. Quinn, makes the statement that the CMB is the resulting energy left over from the annihilation of the matter and anti-matter which arose during cosmic inflation (leaving behind only one part in 30 million of ordinary matter). Wouldn't there be far more radiation in the CMB if this were true? Wouldn't the temperature be much higher? I was under the impression that the energy of the cmb was considerably lower than the energy found in matter in the universe.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
The CMB was directly created by the thermal motion of the plasma in the early universe. During recombination, electrons combined with protons and this opaque plasma turned into transparent gas. This allowed the thermal radiation to propagate freely throughout the universe and it has, over time, been redshifted from the visible frequencies into the microwave frequencies. Perhaps Dr. Quinn means that the thermal energy of his plasma was mostly generated from the annihilation of matter and antimatter, which would have left a significant amount of energy behind as photons, which were then absorbed into the plasma and turned into heat.

Herbascious J said:
I was under the impression that the energy of the cmb was considerably lower than the energy found in matter in the universe.

That's a good question. I know much of the energy initially in the CMB has been lost as expansion redshifted it. I'm not sure what the numbers are though.
 
  • #3
Wrote a long post, but Drakkith basically said the same. Let me just add regarding the numbers:
Radiation energy density dilutes faster than matter by one power of the scale factor (due to redshift of the momentum in addition to number density dilution). With the CMB at redshift z ~ 1000, matter energy density has gained roughly three orders of magnitude on radiation since then. This also means radiation temperature was a factor 1e3 higher at the CMB release (temperature is related to energy per photon). With the number density decrease, the photon energy density today is a factor 1e12 lower than at CMB release.
 
  • #4
The matter asymmetry of the early universe is generally agreed to be about 1 part in 10 billion based on CMB measurements. Science is based on observational evidence, not philosophy.
 
  • Like
Likes Herbascious J
  • #5
Chronos said:
The matter asymmetry of the early universe is generally agreed to be about 1 part in 10 billion based on CMB measurements. Science is based on observational evidence, not philosophy.

What part of this is philosophy?
 
  • #6
Apologies Drak, been reading too many threads at once.
 
  • #7
To add another point: the temperature of the CMB at emission was set by the temperature at which the primordial plasma cooled to become a gas. It has nothing to do with how the earlier, higher temperature was generated.

Also, I think it's easier to understand what's going on by looking how expansion impacts temperature rather than energy density: temperature of radiation is inversely proportional to the scale factor. Since things in our universe are, on average, about 1100 times further away from one another than they were when the CMB was emitted, the current CMB temperature is 1/1100th the temperature of the CMB when it was emitted.

One final point: within the primordial plasma, photons and normal matter were interacting very strongly. Because of this, the temperature of normal matter was the same as the temperature of the photons, right up until the CMB was emitted. When the normal matter became a gas, its behavior diverged significantly from the behavior of the CMB.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Chalnoth said:
temperature of radiation is inversely proportional to temperature.
I think you intended to write scale factor. :)
Also, how is this different from what I wrote?
Orodruin said:
This also means radiation temperature was a factor 1e3 higher at the CMB release
 

FAQ: Anti-matter annihilation and the CMBR

What is anti-matter annihilation?

Anti-matter annihilation is a process in which particles of matter and anti-matter collide and completely destroy each other, releasing a large amount of energy in the form of photons.

How does anti-matter annihilation relate to the CMBR?

The CMBR, or cosmic microwave background radiation, is the leftover energy from the Big Bang that permeates the entire universe. Anti-matter annihilation is believed to have occurred during the early stages of the universe, and the resulting photons from this process contribute to the CMBR we observe today.

What are the potential implications of anti-matter annihilation in the early universe?

If anti-matter annihilation did occur in the early universe, it could help explain why there is an imbalance between matter and anti-matter in the universe today. It could also provide insight into the formation and evolution of the universe.

Can we observe anti-matter annihilation in action?

Yes, anti-matter annihilation can be observed in high-energy particle collisions in particle accelerators. However, the remnants of anti-matter annihilation in the early universe are not directly observable as they occurred billions of years ago and the resulting photons have since cooled down to become the CMBR.

Are there any potential practical applications of anti-matter annihilation?

While anti-matter annihilation is currently being studied for its potential use in energy production, it is still in the early stages of research and development. Other potential applications include medical imaging and cancer treatment using positron emission tomography (PET) scans.

Back
Top