Antoine Tilloy theory of gravity

In summary, the conversation discusses the introduction of a modified version of the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber model, which incorporates a classical gravitational field sourced by flashes. This semi-classical theory of Newtonian gravity is in agreement with known experimental data and makes new falsifiable predictions, including that particles do not attract themselves and that the gravitational potential is cut-off at short distances. The conversation also mentions the possibility of combining this model with Verlinde's Emergent Gravity and the implications if experiments confirm the predictions of the modified GRW model.
  • #1
kodama
1,026
139
latest paper

Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber model with massive flashes
Antoine Tilloy
(Submitted on 12 Sep 2017)
We introduce a modification of the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber (GRW) model in which the flashes (or collapse space-time events) source a classical gravitational field. The resulting semi-classical theory of Newtonian gravity preserves the statistical interpretation of quantum states of matter in contrast with mean field approaches. It can be seen as a discrete version of recent proposals of consistent hybrid quantum classical theories. The model seems to be in agreement with known experimental data and introduces new falsifiable predictions: (1) particles do not attract themselves, (2) the 1/r gravitational potential of Newtonian gravity is cut-off at short (≲10−7m) distances, and (3) gravity makes spatial superpositions decohere at a rate inversely proportional to that coming from the vanilla GRW model. Together, the last two predictions make the model experimentally falsifiable for all values of its parameters.
Comments: 10 pages
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Cite as: arXiv:1709.03809 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:1709.03809v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

comments?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Echoes of Verlinde's Emergent Gravity which was found to be close in general terms, but ultimately contrary to, empirical evidence.

I do not see how you can falsify the prediction that particles do not attract themselves, something that the abstract seems to acknowledge in its last sentence.

The second prediction requires a roughly 4 order of magnitude improvement over existing measurements.
 
  • Like
Likes kodama
  • #3
ohwilleke said:
Echoes of Verlinde's Emergent Gravity which was found to be close in general terms, but ultimately contrary to, empirical evidence.

I do not see how you can falsify the prediction that particles do not attract themselves, something that the abstract seems to acknowledge in its last sentence.

The second prediction requires a roughly 4 order of magnitude improvement over existing measurements.

I wonder if you can combine Verlinde's Emergent Gravity with Tilloy's.

if experiments are able to bridge the 4 order of magnitude improvement over existing measurements, and find agreement with Tilloy, what would that imply?
 

FAQ: Antoine Tilloy theory of gravity

What is Antoine Tilloy's theory of gravity?

The Antoine Tilloy theory of gravity is a proposed alternative to the widely-accepted theory of gravity put forth by Isaac Newton. It suggests that gravity is not an attractive force between masses, but rather a curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of matter.

How does Antoine Tilloy's theory differ from Newton's theory of gravity?

The main difference between the two theories is the explanation for how gravity works. Newton's theory states that gravity is a force of attraction between masses, while Tilloy's theory proposes that it is a result of the curvature of spacetime caused by mass.

What evidence supports Antoine Tilloy's theory of gravity?

Currently, there is no experimental evidence that conclusively supports Tilloy's theory of gravity. However, some scientists argue that it could potentially explain certain phenomena, such as the rotation curves of galaxies and the accelerating expansion of the universe.

Are there any criticisms of Antoine Tilloy's theory of gravity?

Yes, there are several criticisms of Tilloy's theory. Some scientists argue that it is not as mathematically consistent as Newton's theory and that it does not fully explain all observed phenomena. Additionally, some argue that it is not testable with current technology.

Could Antoine Tilloy's theory of gravity be proven or disproven in the future?

It is possible that advancements in technology and further research could provide evidence to either support or discredit Tilloy's theory of gravity. However, for now, it remains a theoretical concept and is not widely accepted in the scientific community.

Similar threads

Back
Top