- #1
josh1
Hi all,
Time to start my first thread, so here goes.
The difficulty I have with the landscape is this: How could the solution that seems to describe our universe be the ugliest possible one in a theory whose structure is otherwise supposed to be so deep, beautiful, elegant or whatever?
Does anyone have better reasons for rejecting the landscape?
------------------------------------------------------
From the statement of forum guidelines:
1) Langauge Guidelines: Direct or indirect personal attacks are strictly not permitted. Insults and negative attitudes are not allowed. All members have the right to their own ideas, beliefs and faiths. Members have the right to express these on Physics Forums with equal respect and consideration.
2) PM Guidelines: If exclusively personal contact is needed, use the Private Message system. Do not post a topic where only one member is expected to answer. The administrator reserves the right to, and can, view all private messages.
Time to start my first thread, so here goes.
The difficulty I have with the landscape is this: How could the solution that seems to describe our universe be the ugliest possible one in a theory whose structure is otherwise supposed to be so deep, beautiful, elegant or whatever?
Does anyone have better reasons for rejecting the landscape?
------------------------------------------------------
From the statement of forum guidelines:
1) Langauge Guidelines: Direct or indirect personal attacks are strictly not permitted. Insults and negative attitudes are not allowed. All members have the right to their own ideas, beliefs and faiths. Members have the right to express these on Physics Forums with equal respect and consideration.
2) PM Guidelines: If exclusively personal contact is needed, use the Private Message system. Do not post a topic where only one member is expected to answer. The administrator reserves the right to, and can, view all private messages.