MHB AO+BO+CO≥6r where r is the radius of the inscribed circle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the inequality AO + BO + CO ≥ 6r, where O is the center of the inscribed circle in triangle ABC and r is the radius of that circle. Participants clarify that the problem pertains to the inscribed circle within a triangle, not a triangle inscribed in a circle. The initial confusion arises from interpreting "ABC trigon" as a triangle inscribed in a circle, leading to the incorrect conclusion that AO + BO + CO equals 3r, which is less than 6r. The correct understanding emphasizes the relationship between the triangle's vertices and the inscribed circle's center. The focus remains on establishing the validity of the inequality based on the properties of the triangle and its inscribed circle.
solakis1
Messages
407
Reaction score
0
From the entrance examinations to Ghana University ,from high school, i got the following problem:

If O is the center of the inscribed circle in an ABC trigon,then prove that: $$AO+BO+CO\geq 6r$$ where r is the radius of the inscribed circle.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I first thought that your "ABC trigon" is what I would call a "triangle" but that would make the problem impossible. If ABC is a triangle inscribed in a circle, of radius r, then OA, OB, and OC are equal to r so that OA+ OB+ OC= 3r which is less than 6r.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I first thought that your "ABC trigon" is what I would call a "triangle" but that would make the problem impossible. If ABC is a triangle inscribed in a circle, of radius r, then OA, OB, and OC are equal to r so that OA+ OB+ OC= 3r which is less than 6r.

The question is about the circle inscribed in a triangle, not about a triangle inscribed in a circle.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top