Are All Units in Z[sqrt(2)] of the Form +/- (1 +/- sqrt(2))^n?

  • Thread starter Phillips101
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Units
In summary, every unit in Z[sqrt(2)] can be written as a +/- (1 +/- sqrt(2))^n, and this is a special case of Dirichlet's Unit Theorem. To show this, we can use the fact that the norm of a unit in Z[sqrt(2)] is either 1 or -1, and the smallest unit with norm 1 is 1+sqrt(2). Therefore, any unit can be written as (1+sqrt(2))^k, and this proves that every unit in Z[sqrt(2)] is of the form a +/- (1 +/- sqrt(2))^n.
  • #1
Phillips101
33
0
How would I show that every unit in Z[sqrt(2)] is of the form +/- (1 +/- sqrt(2) )^n ?

I can show these are all units, but I can't show every unit is one of these. From some research, I'm aware this is a special case of Dirichlet's Unit Theorem, but that is far above the level I'm working at.

Any help would be appreciated :)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Every element of [tex]Z[\sqrt{2}][/tex] is of the form [tex]a+b\sqrt{2}[/tex], a,b integers.

Suppose [tex]a+b\sqrt{2}[/tex] is a unit. Then: [tex](a+b\sqrt{2})(c+d\sqrt{2})=1[/tex].

So:[tex]ac+(bc+ad)\sqrt{2}+2bd=1[/tex]. So already you know that [tex]bc=-ad[/tex].

Now just try manipulating the expression you are left with: [tex](ac+2bd=1)[/tex] using this fact. You should be able to show that [tex]a,b,c,d[/tex] must all be either 1 or -1.
 
  • #3
The problem is they don't have to. For example, [tex]3+2\sqrt{2[/tex] is unit in [tex]\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{2} ][/tex]. I'm also trying to solve this problem right now.

Edit: I think I got it. Let [tex]\nu(a+b\sqrt{2})=a^2-2b^2[/tex]. It's multiplicative, so [tex]z[/tex] is unit iff [tex]\nu(z)=\pm 1[/tex]. It's easy to see that signs of [tex]a[/tex] and [tex]b[/tex] doesn't matter when it comes to invertibility, so we can assume [tex]z>0[/tex].

Lemma Smallest element of [tex]\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{2}][/tex] with [tex]z>1[/tex] and [tex]\nu(z)=\pm 1[/tex] is [tex]1+\sqrt{2}[/tex]
Proof
Let [tex]a,b\in \mathbb{N}[/tex]. If such element is of type [tex]a-b\sqrt{2}>1[/tex], then [tex]a+b\sqrt{2}>1[/tex] and so [tex]\nu({a-b\sqrt{2}})>1[/tex]. Similarly if it's [tex]-a+b\sqrt{2}[/tex]. It has to be [tex]a+b\sqrt{2}[/tex]. Case with one of a, b equal zero is easily checked by hand. This proves the lemma.

Now suppose [tex]\nu(z)=1[/tex], [tex]z > 0[/tex]. Let [tex] z_0 = 1+\sqrt{2}[/tex]. There exists integer k (positive or negative) with [tex]z_0^k \leq z < z_0^{k+1}[/tex]. Easily to check, [tex]1\leq z z_0^{-k} < z_0[/tex]. If [tex]z z_0^{-k}\neq 1[/tex], it contradicts minimality of [tex]z_0[/tex], and so [tex]z=z_0^k[/tex].

Hope I haven't messed up too badly.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Are All Units in Z[sqrt(2)] of the Form +/- (1 +/- sqrt(2))^n?

What is Z[sqrt(2)]?

Z[sqrt(2)] is a mathematical concept known as the ring of integers extended by the square root of 2. It is represented as {a + b*sqrt(2) | a, b ∈ Z}, where a and b are integers.

How do you find all units in Z[sqrt(2)]?

To find all units in Z[sqrt(2)], you can use the Euclidean algorithm to find the greatest common divisor (GCD) of the elements in Z[sqrt(2)]. The GCD will be 1 for all units in Z[sqrt(2)].

Can you provide an example of finding units in Z[sqrt(2)]?

Sure, let's find the units in Z[sqrt(2)] using the elements 2 and 3. The GCD of 2 and 3 is 1, so both 2 and 3 are units in Z[sqrt(2)].

How many units are there in Z[sqrt(2)]?

There are infinitely many units in Z[sqrt(2)], as there is no limit to the values of a and b in the representation {a + b*sqrt(2) | a, b ∈ Z}.

What is the significance of finding all units in Z[sqrt(2)]?

Finding all units in Z[sqrt(2)] is important in number theory and algebraic geometry, as it helps in understanding the structure and properties of this mathematical concept. It also has applications in cryptography and coding theory.

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Back
Top