- #1
- 3,581
- 107
What do members think of http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0506/0506024.pdf paper?
Is this a valid point? As detection sensitivities improve, with new detectors and time, should GWs already have been detected?
Garth
It reads as 'crackpot' to me, claiming as it does that gravitational waves cannot exist, however, it cites as supporting evidence the fact that GWs have not been detected yet.Abstract. I give here:
i) a very simple proof that the physical non-existence of gravitational waves (GW’s) is quite consistent with the basic principles of general relativity (GR);
ii) a new argument against the physical existence of GW’s;
iii) a criticism of Fock’s treatment of the GW’s;
iv) some remarks on recent experimental investigations concerning the GW’s.
Is this a valid point? As detection sensitivities improve, with new detectors and time, should GWs already have been detected?
Garth
Last edited by a moderator: