I Are Peak Moment and Peak Torque Equivalents in Biodex Dynamometry Measurements?

AI Thread Summary
Peak moment and peak torque in biodex dynamometry measurements refer to similar concepts but are used in different contexts. While engineers may refer to peak moment, physicists typically use the term peak torque, as torque specifically involves rotational force. Both terms can be expressed in Newton-meters (Nm), but they may not always represent the same physical quantity depending on the context of the measurement. Understanding the distinction is crucial for accurate interpretation of knee muscle strength outcomes. Clarifying terminology can help avoid confusion in reporting and analyzing dynamometry results.
teokevin11
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Peak Moment vs. Peak Torque in Knee Extension
Apologies if this is in the wrong section as it isn't particularly medical in nature despite it being about the body.

I am currently conducting a rapid review with outcomes of knee muscle strength. This is measured by biodex dynamometry, which assesses numerous values including Peak moment (Nm). My issue is that another study has also used the same equipment but reported values of (Nm) as peak torque which makes sense as the movement in question is rotational (Think bent knee -> straight knee, the peak force produced by this movement). My question is whether these two values are the same but have been reported differently or if it is a completely different value with the same unit of measurement.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
What an engineer calls a moment, a physicist calls a torque.
The least confusing term would probably be torque.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Dale
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_(physics) said:
In physics, a moment is an expression involving the product of a distance and physical quantity
So a moment can involve any physical quantity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torque said:
In physics and mechanics, torque is the rotational equivalent of linear force.
A torque is a moment that specifically involves a force.

And there is also a couple, which is a special case of a torque:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Couple_(mechanics) said:
In mechanics, a couple is a system of forces with a resultant (a.k.a.net or sum) moment but no resultant force.
So in the following figure, the top arrangement is a force producing a torque. But the bottom arrangement is a resultant force F (not producing a torque), and two forces C producing a couple. They both have the same effect on the system.

Force_and_couple.png
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Have both values the same magnitude in Newtons-meter?
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top