Are the Force Equations for Rotational Motion Accurate?

In summary, the article examines the accuracy of the force equations used in rotational motion, highlighting their theoretical foundations and practical applications. It discusses the assumptions underlying these equations, such as uniformity and ideal conditions, and critiques their limitations in real-world scenarios. The piece emphasizes the importance of understanding these constraints to improve the accuracy of predictions in engineering and physics, suggesting that while the equations are useful, they may require modifications for complex systems.
  • #1
Bling Fizikst
96
10
Homework Statement
refer to image
Relevant Equations
refer to image
Screenshot 2024-03-24 212556.png


Writing force equations for block ##m## : $$T-mr\omega^2=m\ddot{r}$$ and for block ##M## : $$Mg-T=M\ddot{r}$$ I think there are mistakes in my equations as they are leading to nowhere and morever i think force methods are really risky in this regard . It would be better to write the total energy of the system which i don't know how to . I tried to write $$\frac{1}{2}m\dot{r}^2 +\frac{1}{2}M\dot{r}^2 + \frac{L^2}{2mr^2} +U(r)=E$$ where ##L=mR^2\omega##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Have you done any Lagrangian mechanics?
 
  • #3
PeroK said:
Have you done any Lagrangian mechanics?
No
 
  • Sad
Likes PeroK
  • #4
Bling Fizikst said:
No
It should come out from conservation of AM and energy. You're aiming for an equation for ##\ddot r##. Which you should be able to get from:

Bling Fizikst said:
$$\frac{1}{2}m\dot{r}^2 +\frac{1}{2}M\dot{r}^2 + \frac{L^2}{2mr^2} +U(r)=E$$ where ##L=mR^2\omega##
 
  • #5
... differentiating the energy equation should work.
 
  • #6
PeroK said:
... differentiating the energy equation should work.
I did that but how do i deal with the potential energy of the system : ##U(r)## $$(m+M)\ddot{r}-\frac{L^2}{mr^3}+U'(r)=0$$
 
  • #7
Bling Fizikst said:
I did that but how do i deal with the potential energy of the system : ##U(r)##
You should be able to express that in terms of ##r##.
 
  • #8
PeroK said:
You should be able to express that in terms of ##r##.
Need help on this , really deadstuck . Writing forces and using ##\frac{-\partial U}{\partial r}=F## doesn't seem to help?
 
  • #9
Bling Fizikst said:
I did that but how do i deal with the potential energy of the system : ##U(r)## $$(m+M)\ddot{r}-\frac{L^2}{mr^3}+U'(r)=0$$
What precisely is stopping you from writing down an expression for ##U(r)##?
 
  • #10
Bling Fizikst said:
Need help on this , really deadstuck . Writing forces and using ##\frac{-\partial U}{\partial r}=F## doesn't seem to help?
How does the position of the mass M depend on ##r##? Take ##r = R## as the zero point.
 
  • #11
Is it -Mgr:nb)
 
  • Sad
Likes PeroK
  • #12
Bling Fizikst said:
Is it -Mgr:nb)
What happens to ##M## as ##r## increases?
 
  • #13
it goes up so +Mgr? please forgive me if i am acting dumb , this is my first time using the potential energy function in this way . It gives me the wrong ans anyways , so it is wrong
 
  • #14
Bling Fizikst said:
it goes up so +Mgr? please forgive me if i am acting dumb , this is my first time using the potential energy function in this way
Yes. Note that ##Mg## is related to ##L## by the initial equilibrium.
 
  • #15
$$(m+M)\ddot{r} -mr\omega^2- 2mr\omega^2=0$$ $$\implies \omega'=\sqrt{\frac{3m\omega^2}{m+M}}$$
 
  • #16
Bling Fizikst said:
$$(m+M)\ddot{r} -mr\omega^2- 2mr\omega^2=0$$ $$\implies \omega'=\sqrt{\frac{3m\omega^2}{m+M}}$$
That's the right answer, but I'm not sure quite how you got there.
 
  • #17
PeroK said:
That's the right answer, but I'm not sure quite how you got there.
##F = -kr## implies ##\omega = \sqrt{k/m}##.
 
  • #18
vela said:
##F = -kr## implies ##\omega = \sqrt{k/m}##.
No need to consider only small oscillations?
 
  • #19
Oh, you were asking about the steps preceding that last step. Yeah, the OP isn't exactly forthcoming with his reasoning.
 
  • #20
Bling Fizikst said:
I did that but how do i deal with the potential energy of the system : ##U(r)## $$(m+M)\ddot{r}-\frac{L^2}{mr^3}+U'(r)=0$$
I wonder whether you replaced ##L^2## with ##mr^2w## here? To get from the above equation to this:
Bling Fizikst said:
$$(m+M)\ddot{r} -mr\omega^2- 2mr\omega^2=0$$
In any case, the solution only applies to small oscillations. You will need an approximation somewhere.
 
  • #21
PeroK said:
I wonder whether you replaced ##L^2## with ##mr^2w## here? To get from the above equation to this:
Yes
 
  • #22
Note that ##w## is a constant, like ##M, g## and ##R## and is the fixed angular velocity at the equilibrium. ##r## and ##\dot \theta## are the variables. We have:
$$L = mR^2w = mr^2\dot \theta$$Also, with ##U(r) = Mgr##, we have:
$$\frac d{dt} U(r) = Mg\dot r$$And
$$\frac d {dt}\dot r^2 = 2\dot r \ddot r$$
 
  • Like
Likes Bling Fizikst
  • #23
Anyways , i found a really elegant solution in David Morin :
1711305500535.png
 
  • #24
Bling Fizikst said:
Anyways , i found a really elegant solution in David Morin : View attachment 342284
The idea is that you do these problems yourself. Not just to find a solution online.
 
  • #25
PeroK said:
The idea is that you do these problems yourself. Not just to find a solution online.
This was a new learning experience for me , so i don't really mind . But i do agree that one should try to solve problems on their own . At the end , it just matters that i learnt to solve it even if i had to look at the solution.
I just learnt a new technique and i am happy!

Also , i would love to thank you for patiently helping me throughout the problem 😇
 

FAQ: Are the Force Equations for Rotational Motion Accurate?

Are the force equations for rotational motion based on empirical evidence?

Yes, the force equations for rotational motion are based on extensive empirical evidence and experimental validation. These equations have been tested and confirmed through numerous experiments and observations in physics.

How do the force equations for rotational motion compare to those for linear motion?

The force equations for rotational motion are analogous to those for linear motion but are adapted to account for rotational variables. For example, torque is the rotational equivalent of force, angular acceleration is the rotational equivalent of linear acceleration, and moment of inertia is the rotational equivalent of mass.

Are there any limitations to the accuracy of the force equations for rotational motion?

While the force equations for rotational motion are highly accurate in many scenarios, they can have limitations in cases involving very high speeds, extreme conditions, or complex interactions such as those found in non-rigid bodies or relativistic contexts. In such cases, more advanced or specialized models may be required.

Can the force equations for rotational motion be applied to all types of rotating systems?

The force equations for rotational motion are generally applicable to a wide range of rotating systems, including rigid bodies and simple mechanical systems. However, for systems involving significant deformation, fluid dynamics, or other complex interactions, additional factors may need to be considered for accurate modeling.

How do real-world factors like friction and air resistance affect the accuracy of rotational motion equations?

Real-world factors such as friction and air resistance can affect the accuracy of rotational motion equations. These factors introduce additional forces and torques that must be accounted for to make precise predictions. In practical applications, these effects are often included in more comprehensive models to improve accuracy.

Back
Top