Are there any inherent advantages of using He3-He3 over d-He3?

  • Thread starter privick
  • Start date
In summary, He3-He3 and d-He3 fusion are two types of nuclear fusion reactions that use helium isotopes as fuel. He3-He3 fusion produces more energy and does not produce harmful radiation or require a rare isotope, but it faces challenges such as obtaining and controlling high temperatures and pressures. Ongoing research and development are being conducted to address these challenges and make He3-He3 fusion a potential solution for clean and sustainable energy in the future.
  • #1
privick
1
0
From what I have researched so far, He3-He3's only advantage is that it produces minuscule amounts of neutrons at the expense of lower energy output, higher ignition temperature, and longer confinement time. The expenses also do not even take into account the higher Bremsstrahlung losses eating away at potential power output. With these reasons in mind, am I missing something that makes He3-He3 a third generation fusion fuel hence more desirable than d-He3? This is even more confusing as it would seem that d-He3 is easier to achieve with most of the benefits of aneutronic fusion. Furthermore, d-He3 produces more energetic products and is self sufficient in producing helium 3 as a side reaction. Is reducing the neutron output from a few percentage points (in d-He3) to near zero warrant He3-He3 as a desirable fusion fuel cycle?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
privick said:
Is reducing the neutron output from a few percentage points (in d-He3) to near zero warrant He3-He3 as a desirable fusion fuel cycle?
Short answer, no. One may wish to research more into aneutronic fusion reactions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aneutronic_fusion

The d + 3He => 4He + p + 18.3 MeV is aneutronic, but given equal amounts of d and 3He in a plasma, there will be side reactions. One has to look at the reaction rates of d+d, d+3He and 3He + 3He at the temperature that is optimal for the desired reaction (d+3He).

Looking at 3He + 3He => 4He + 2p + 12.86 MeV, there is no advantage to that reaction in terms of energy. The bremstrahlung and recombination losses would be greater for a pure 3He plasma, and the optimal temperature much greater than that for a d + 3He reaction.
 
  • #3


I completely agree with your assessment of He3-He3 as a fusion fuel. It seems that the only advantage is the potential for aneutronic fusion, but the trade-offs in terms of energy output and other factors make it less desirable than d-He3. It's also worth considering the practicality of obtaining and using He3 as a fuel source, as it is very rare on Earth and would likely need to be mined from the moon or other sources. Overall, it seems that d-He3 would be a more feasible and efficient option for fusion.
 

FAQ: Are there any inherent advantages of using He3-He3 over d-He3?

What is He3-He3 and d-He3 fusion?

He3-He3 and d-He3 fusion are nuclear reactions that occur when two helium-3 atoms or a deuterium atom and a helium-3 atom combine to form a helium-4 atom. These reactions release a large amount of energy and are being studied as potential sources of clean, renewable energy.

What are the differences between He3-He3 and d-He3 fusion?

The main difference between He3-He3 and d-He3 fusion is the type of atoms involved. He3-He3 fusion involves two helium-3 atoms, while d-He3 fusion involves a deuterium atom and a helium-3 atom. Additionally, He3-He3 fusion produces more energy per reaction compared to d-He3 fusion.

Are there any inherent advantages of using He3-He3 over d-He3?

There are a few potential advantages of using He3-He3 fusion over d-He3 fusion. These include a higher energy output per reaction, a lower rate of neutron production (which reduces the risk of radioactive waste), and a shorter half-life of the resulting waste products.

What are the challenges of using He3-He3 fusion?

One of the main challenges of using He3-He3 fusion is the scarcity of helium-3 on Earth. It is estimated that there is only a small amount of helium-3 available on our planet, making it difficult to sustain large-scale fusion reactions. Additionally, the technology for controlling and containing the high temperatures and pressures required for He3-He3 fusion is still in development.

Is He3-He3 fusion currently being used for energy production?

No, He3-He3 fusion is not currently being used for energy production. While it is being studied as a potential energy source, the technology and resources needed for large-scale fusion reactions are not yet available. Research and development in this field are ongoing.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
53
Views
10K
Back
Top