- #1
privick
- 1
- 0
From what I have researched so far, He3-He3's only advantage is that it produces minuscule amounts of neutrons at the expense of lower energy output, higher ignition temperature, and longer confinement time. The expenses also do not even take into account the higher Bremsstrahlung losses eating away at potential power output. With these reasons in mind, am I missing something that makes He3-He3 a third generation fusion fuel hence more desirable than d-He3? This is even more confusing as it would seem that d-He3 is easier to achieve with most of the benefits of aneutronic fusion. Furthermore, d-He3 produces more energetic products and is self sufficient in producing helium 3 as a side reaction. Is reducing the neutron output from a few percentage points (in d-He3) to near zero warrant He3-He3 as a desirable fusion fuel cycle?