Graduate Are there any theorems restricting possible QG candidates?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of identifying viable quantum gravity (QG) candidates, particularly in light of string theory's theoretical success without experimental validation. Participants question whether there are established no-go theorems that could eliminate certain models or geometrical objects from consideration in QG. The Coleman-Mandula theorem is mentioned as a known restriction, prompting inquiries into additional constraints that might apply to quantized geometries. The conversation highlights the need for criteria to discern fruitful models of the universe amidst various theoretical frameworks. Overall, the quest for definitive restrictions on QG candidates remains an open and complex issue in theoretical physics.
Kontilera
Messages
176
Reaction score
24
String theory, being such a theoretically successful theory as it is but with no experiment to single it out as THE model among alternatives, Im left to wonder, which models can be excluded? Are there essential no-go theorems regarding the physics of a theory for QG?
Im aware of the Coleman-Mandula theorem, but are there also restrictions to, say, which geometrical objects that, when quantized, could give rise to fruitful models of our universe?

Thanks.

// Curious
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
arXiv:gr-qc/0306083 (gr-qc)
[Submitted on 18 Jun 2003 (v1), last revised 19 Jun 2003 (this version, v2)]
A Note On The Chern-Simons And Kodama Wavefunctions
Edward Witten
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
15K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K