Are there any whole numbers that satisfy this equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter donglepuss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
Click For Summary
The equation x^3 - y^2 + ab = a - b(x + y) raises questions about the existence of whole number solutions for x, y, a, and b. Initial discussions reveal that x = y = a = b = 0 is a trivial solution, while other combinations such as x = 1, y = 1, a = -4, and b = 2 were suggested but debated due to the definition of whole numbers. Participants explored various algebraic manipulations and factorizations to find nontrivial positive solutions, emphasizing the need for the variables to be positive integers. The conversation highlighted the importance of defining terms clearly, particularly regarding whether zero is considered a whole number, and concluded with suggestions for specific values of a and b to derive more solutions. Overall, the thread illustrates the complexity of the problem and the collaborative effort to explore potential solutions.
donglepuss
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
Member warned that some effort must be shown
Homework Statement
##x^3-y^2+ab=a-b(x+y)## for any whole numbers ##x,y,a,b##
Relevant Equations
##x^3-y^2+ab=a-b(x+y)##
are there any whole numbers for x,y,a,b, that satisfy x^3-y^2+ab=a-b(x+y)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
donglepuss said:
Homework Statement: ##x^3-y^2+ab=a-b(x+y)## for any whole numbers ##x,y,a,b##
Homework Equations: ##x^3-y^2+ab=a-b(x+y)##

are there any whole numbers for x,y,a,b, that satisfy x^3-y^2+ab=a-b(x+y)
Before we can give help, you need to show some effort at getting a solution according to PF guidelines.

Once you do that, do you mean that ##x,y,a,b## actually need to be whole numbers, or is it that they need to be integers instead?
 
donglepuss said:
are there any whole numbers for x,y,a,b, that satisfy x^3-y^2+ab=a-b(x+y)
Yes. x=y=a=b=0.
 
Try turning into a quadratic or cubic by selecting the right variable.
 
##x=1,~y=1,~a=-4,~b=2##
Edit: Never mind. I guess whole numbers can't be negative. And apparently it's debatable whether ##0## is a whole number.
 
LCKurtz said:
And apparently it's debatable whether ##0## is a whole number.
Do you have a source that contests this?
 
The a, b, ab terms suggest factorising how?
 
  • #10
  • Informative
Likes DaveC426913
  • #12
haruspex said:
Perhaps more relevantly, there are nontrivial positive solutions.
Yeah, we're just waiting for the OP to come back with some effort.
 
  • #13
DaveC426913 said:
Yeah, we're just waiting for the OP to come back with some effort.
I was concerned that the small hint I gave in post #7 might get lost amid the more arcane discussion.😏
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
  • #14
btw, i meant positive integers when i said whole numbers
 
  • Like
Likes ryl3gol
  • #15
donglepuss said:
btw, i meant positive integers when i said whole numbers
Understood. Did you try my hint in post #7?
 
  • #16
haruspex said:
I was concerned that the small hint I gave in post #7 might get lost amid the more arcane discussion.😏
I don't see an apparent relation, what I could achieve for the moment is :
$$(x+y)(x-y-b)=-x^3+x^2+a-ab$$
by adding and subtracting ##x^2##.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Buzz Bloom said:
Hi Dave:

I found a source that confirms your view.
Well, it wasn't "my" view :wink: - I checked a half dozen sources first, to verify the consensus that 0 is a whole number.
 
  • #19
archaic said:
I don't see an apparent relation, what I could achieve for the moment is :
$$(x+y)(x-y-b)=-x^3+x^2+a-ab$$
by adding and subtracting ##x^2##.
That's not what I have in mind. Think of a and b as the variables of a quadratic.
 
  • #20
haruspex said:
That's not what I have in mind. Think of a and b as the variables of a quadratic.
Yes, I have asked elsewhere and got the same answer. We can find that ##y=\frac{b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4(-x^3-bx-ab+a)}}{2}=\frac{b \pm \sqrt{b^2+4x^3+4bx+4ab-4a}}{2}##
 
  • #21
archaic said:
Yes, I have asked elsewhere and got the same answer. We can find that ##y=\frac{b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4(-x^3-bx-ab+a)}}{2}=\frac{b \pm \sqrt{b^2+4x^3+4bx+4ab-4a}}{2}##
As I posted, think of a and b as the variables, x and y as constants, and factorise on that basis.
(It might be more obvious if you swap the roles of a, b with those of x, y.)
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Now we need to see if we can find conditions under which the discriminant is an integer ( necessary but not sufficient). Edit: Maybe we can do the same with other variables and put it together into a tighter condition.
 
Last edited:
  • #23
Suggest looking for a simple solution: Set ##a=b=1 ##. I think I found a very simple ##x ## and ##y ##.
 
  • #24
Charles Link said:
Suggest looking for a simple solution: Set ##a=b=1 ##. I think I found a very simple ##x ## and ##y ##.
As I keep trying to get @archaic to do, it is much easier to find solutions if you flip it around, thinking of a and b as the dependent variables. See posts #7 and #21.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
  • #25
haruspex said:
As I keep trying to get @archaic to do, it is much easier to find solutions if you flip it around, thinking of a and b as the dependent variables. See posts #7 and #21.
But @archaic is not the OP, who has not shown any effort.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS and Charles Link
  • #26
WWGD said:
But @archaic is not the OP, who has not shown any effort.
Yes, thanks, I should have referenced @donglepuss .
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD and Charles Link
  • #27
We are sort of in limbo=it's an interesting problem, but by PF rules, even if we have a whole set of solutions, we can't post them, but instead are waiting for the OP to see if he can find some solutions...
 
  • #28
Charles Link said:
We are sort of in limbo=it's an interesting problem, but by PF rules, even if we have a whole set of solutions, we can't post them, but instead are waiting for the OP to see if he can find some solutions...
True, it is frustrating. Happens all too often.
But maybe it is partly because different contributors are pushing in different directions. If you agree my method makes the problem easy, please post so.
 
  • #29
haruspex said:
As I posted, think of a and b as the variables, x and y as constants, and factorise on that basis.
(It might be more obvious if you swap the roles of a, b with those of x, y.)
do you mean get a as a function of b or the other way around?
 
  • #30
archaic said:
do you mean get a as a function of b or the other way around?
Neither.
Get it into the form (a+...)(b+..)=...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K