- #1
FzKl
- 3
- 0
Hi everyone.
I'm new to the forum so sorry if the title or the "sub-topic" is wrong, and I tried my best not to break the posting guidelines, if I did, let me know.
(First of all, I want to clarify what's my stance on all of this, I'm not a proponent of these ideas; in fact, I'm always sceptical of these new models.)
So, I recently stumbled across this page.
Beware, multiple walls of text ahead
http://www.askamathematician.com/2009/12/q-howwhy-are-quantum-mechanics-and-relativity-incompatible/
And well... The question is not related to the post per se but actually to the comments of the post.
And the question is: Does any of Tuck's or Auci's comments holds any truth? Are they really relevant? and what's your opinion of it?
(I didn't find any paper regarding Tuck's claims, so this is the best I've got)
I'm really haunted by this specific topic, I don't know what to think about it (And because I don't really know that much of physics).
I know I'm asking a lot from you, I really do. but I would really appreciate if you could take a look at this.
Let's hope this thread doesn't become a battlefield
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are some "shortcuts" for some of what is linked in the comments
This is Massimo's research
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0901/0901.2752.pdf
https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3861
And this is Tuck's Wikiversity profile. if you want to read it... for... some reason...
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:Stephen_Tuck/Theory_of_Everything
I'm new to the forum so sorry if the title or the "sub-topic" is wrong, and I tried my best not to break the posting guidelines, if I did, let me know.
(First of all, I want to clarify what's my stance on all of this, I'm not a proponent of these ideas; in fact, I'm always sceptical of these new models.)
So, I recently stumbled across this page.
Beware, multiple walls of text ahead
http://www.askamathematician.com/2009/12/q-howwhy-are-quantum-mechanics-and-relativity-incompatible/
And well... The question is not related to the post per se but actually to the comments of the post.
And the question is: Does any of Tuck's or Auci's comments holds any truth? Are they really relevant? and what's your opinion of it?
(I didn't find any paper regarding Tuck's claims, so this is the best I've got)
I'm really haunted by this specific topic, I don't know what to think about it (And because I don't really know that much of physics).
I know I'm asking a lot from you, I really do. but I would really appreciate if you could take a look at this.
Let's hope this thread doesn't become a battlefield
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are some "shortcuts" for some of what is linked in the comments
This is Massimo's research
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0901/0901.2752.pdf
https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3861
And this is Tuck's Wikiversity profile. if you want to read it... for... some reason...
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:Stephen_Tuck/Theory_of_Everything