Are We in the Middle of the Universe?

  • Thread starter PrestonMcCall
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Universe
In summary, the shape of the universe is unknown but the best analogy is that it is a sphere. This is due to the finite distance that light can travel in the time the universe has existed. Therefore, every observer will see themselves at the center of their observable universe. The visible universe has a diameter of about 93 billion light-years and is considered flat as an approximation. It is not limited in any direction, giving the appearance of us being in the center of a sphere. However, this is just an illusion and the universe has no overall structure. Additionally, it is not theoretically possible for two objects to have a closing or separating speed greater than the speed of light. The concept of "closing speed" is just an apparent speed
  • #1
PrestonMcCall
3
0
Are we in the middle of the universe? I mean, imagine the universe is some sperical or odd shaped three dimensional shape. We can 'see' out to some pint, but is it always a similar distance, making us iin the middle? It makes sense that if the outer edge of the universe is expanding at a rate greater than the speed of light, then we would only be able to see a finite distance and that it would be similar in distance from us? The light ohoton would never reach us from anywhere outside of the area speeding faster than the speed of light.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
The shape of the universe is unknown. The best analogy we have is that the universe is a sphere. thus is due to the light reaching us at the same time.
It is hard to tell where )or how large it is) in the universe we are due to this.
cheers, BT
 
  • #3
Remember that light has only been traveling for ~13/14 billion years. That means we can only see anything that is up to 13/14 billion light years away. This is not limited in any direction, so we see everything 13/14 billion light years away in all directions, giving the appearance of us being in the centre of a sphere.
 
  • #4
Every observer will see themselves to be in the center of their observable universe, just like when you stand on the surface of the Earth you are in the center of the region defined by your horizon. We don't know, and probably can never know, what is beyond our cosmological horizon.
 
  • #5
everyone will see as if they are in the middle of the universe because it is infinite..pass 300pc or 300Mpc the universe has no structure
 
  • #6
Is it theoretically 'allowed' for Mass A and Mass B to have a closing speed that is greater than C? e.g. Mass A is headed towards Mass B with its 'real' speed greater than .5 C, and Mass B is headed towards Mass A with its 'real' speed greater than .5 C.
Likewise for them to have a separating speed greater than C ?
 
  • #7
No, this is covered in introductory relativity textbooks.
 
  • #8
From wiki (observable uni)
The visible universe is thus a sphere with a diameter about 93 billion light-years.

Is this a mistake? Aren't they talking about observable not visible? Which visible means what we can see as in the only up to the cmb?
 
  • #9
Chronos said:
No, this is covered in introductory relativity textbooks.

In a Synchrotron particles, that are each traveling at near the speed of light, are at times traveling towards each other and away from each other at a differential velocity much greater than C. This can't be taking place?
 
  • #10
seto6 said:
everyone will see as if they are in the middle of the universe because it is infinite..pass 300 pc or 300Mpc the universe has no structure

Something without shape or structure can exist? How?
 
  • #11
justwondering said:
Is it theoretically 'allowed' for Mass A and Mass B to have a closing speed that is greater than C? e.g. Mass A is headed towards Mass B with its 'real' speed greater than .5 C, and Mass B is headed towards Mass A with its 'real' speed greater than .5 C.
Likewise for them to have a separating speed greater than C ?

"Closing speed" can exceed c, Relative speed can't.

Closing speed is the apparent respective speed as seen by an observer not sharing a rest frame with either object. For example, if I see a particle coming from my left at 0.75c and one coming from my right at 0.75c, then according to me, the closing speed between the two is 1.5 c

Relative speed is the speed of one object with respect to another as measured from the rest frame of either object. It would be the speed either of the particles measures as the difference of velocity between the two, which would equal 0.96c in our example.

Closing speed is no more "real" than relative speed.
 
  • #12
Calluuuum said:
Remember that light has only been traveling for ~13/14 billion years. That means we can only see anything that is up to 13/14 billion light years away. This is not limited in any direction, so we see everything 13/14 billion light years away in all directions, giving the appearance of us being in the centre of a sphere.

If so, how is it that it is said that the universe is flat ?
 
  • #13
it is flat as an approximation, just like a plain on earth
 
  • #14
Janus said:
"Closing speed" can exceed c, Relative speed can't.

Closing speed is the apparent respective speed as seen by an observer not sharing a rest frame with either object. For example, if I see a particle coming from my left at 0.75c and one coming from my right at 0.75c, then according to me, the closing speed between the two is 1.5 c

Relative speed is the speed of one object with respect to another as measured from the rest frame of either object. It would be the speed either of the particles measures as the difference of velocity between the two, which would equal 0.96c in our example.

Closing speed is no more "real" than relative speed.

No .
 

FAQ: Are We in the Middle of the Universe?

What is the current scientific consensus on our position in the Universe?

According to the current understanding in the field of cosmology, there is no definitive answer to whether we are in the middle of the Universe or not. The concept of a "middle" implies a center, which is not supported by current theories of the Universe.

How do scientists determine our position in the Universe?

Scientists use various observational methods, such as mapping the distribution of galaxies and measuring the cosmic microwave background radiation, to determine our position in the Universe. However, these methods do not provide a clear answer to whether we are in the middle or not.

Is there any evidence to suggest that we are in the middle of the Universe?

No, there is currently no scientific evidence to support the idea that we are in the exact middle of the Universe. The Universe is vast and constantly expanding, making it impossible to pinpoint a single "middle" point.

Why do some people believe that we are in the middle of the Universe?

Some people may believe that we are in the middle of the Universe due to a misunderstanding of the term "middle" and the structure of the Universe. The observable Universe is symmetrical and appears to have a center, which can lead to the misconception that we are in the middle.

Could future scientific discoveries change our understanding of our position in the Universe?

Yes, as our understanding of the Universe continues to evolve, it is possible that future discoveries may provide new insights into our position in the Universe. However, it is unlikely that these discoveries will definitively prove or disprove the concept of a "middle" in the Universe.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
103
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
570
Back
Top