- #1
Clever-Name
- 380
- 1
Homework Statement
Show that the parity operation (reflection through the origin) on a point [itex] (\rho, \varphi, z) [/itex] relative to fixed (x, y, z) axes consists of the transformation:
[tex] \rho \to \rho [/tex]
[tex] \varphi \to \varphi \pm \pi [/tex]
[tex] z \to -z [/tex]
Also, show that the unit vectors of the cylindrical polar coordinate system [itex] \hat{e}_{\rho} [/itex] and [itex] \hat{e}_{\phi} [/itex] have odd parity while [itex] \hat{e}_{z} [/itex] has even parity
Homework Equations
Not sure
The Attempt at a Solution
All I know about Parity is it's definition. I know that for a vector (x,y,z) if you apply the parity operator you get (-x,-y,-z). So I thought maybe if you take the coordinates [itex] (\rho, \varphi, z) [/itex] and write it as:
[tex] \rho = \sqrt{x^{2} + y^{2}} [/tex]
[tex] \varphi = arctan(\frac{y}{x}) [/tex]
[tex] z = z [/tex]
And apply what I know about Parity I would get:
[tex] \rho' = \sqrt{(-x)^{2} + (-y)^{2}} = \rho [/tex]
[tex] \varphi' = arctan(\frac{-y}{-x}) = \arctan(\frac{y}{x}) = \varphi [/tex]
[tex] z' = -z [/tex]
Now I realize the definition of [itex] \varphi [/itex] depends on the x and y values, so I suppose I could reason that it should be [itex] \varphi \pm \pi [/itex] based on that, but I'm uncomfortable just outright stating it. I feel like there should be more to it.I haven't attempted the last part yet.
Last edited: