Aristotle's Theory of Motion: Natural & Violent

  • Thread starter parshyaa
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Motion
In summary, Aristotle's theory of motion includes two types of motion: natural motion and violent motion. Natural motion is when objects move without any apparent external force, such as a falling object or the motion of the Sun. On the other hand, violent motion is caused by an observed force acting on an object, such as a push, pull, or a strike. This term is still used today to refer to non-natural events. The Greek meaning of "violent" was to overpower, which accurately describes the force behind this type of motion.
  • #1
parshyaa
307
19
Can any budy explain the aristotle's theory of motion : natural motion and violent motion
Please do not give the wikipedia link , I already read it ,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Most simply nature motion was that motion that occurred without any apparent applied force, a motion that seem to occur by itself, e.g. a falling object, the Suns motion across the sky.. It was the nature of objects to move the way they didi. Violent motion was a motion resulting from an observed force acting on an object.as a push, pull or a striking of an object by another object. ANy non natural motion was a violent motion Even today the term violent refers to a non natural event. The Greek meaning of violent was to overpower quite appropriate for a force.
 

FAQ: Aristotle's Theory of Motion: Natural & Violent

What is Aristotle's Theory of Motion?

Aristotle's Theory of Motion is a philosophical explanation of how objects move in the natural world. According to Aristotle, all objects have a natural place and motion, which is either towards their natural place or away from it.

What is the difference between natural and violent motion in Aristotle's Theory?

Natural motion is the movement of objects towards their natural place, while violent motion is the movement caused by an external force. Natural motion is continuous and eternal, while violent motion is temporary and eventually comes to an end.

How does Aristotle's Theory of Motion contradict modern scientific understanding?

Aristotle's Theory of Motion conflicts with modern physics because it does not account for the concept of inertia. According to Aristotle, an object will naturally come to a rest unless a force is constantly acting on it, whereas in modern physics, an object will continue to move at a constant speed unless acted upon by a force.

How did Aristotle's Theory of Motion influence scientific thought?

Aristotle's Theory of Motion was the dominant explanation of motion for over a thousand years and heavily influenced the work of prominent scientists such as Galileo and Newton. It also sparked debates and further investigations into the nature of motion, leading to new discoveries and advancements in scientific thought.

How does Aristotle's Theory of Motion relate to his ideas about the natural world?

Aristotle believed that the natural world was made up of four elements (earth, water, air, and fire) and that these elements had a natural place and motion. His theory of motion was closely tied to his belief in a hierarchical universe, where everything had a specific role and purpose. This perspective influenced his ideas about biology, astronomy, and metaphysics.

Similar threads

Back
Top