MHB Arithmetic Progression: Expressing d in Terms of x,y,z,n

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $a_1,a_2,\,\cdots,\,a_{2n}$ be an arithmetic progression of positive real numbers with common difference $d$. Let
(1) $a_1^2+a_3^2+\cdots+a_{2n-1}^2=x$
(2) $a_2^2+a_4^2+\cdots+a_{2n}^2=y$
(3) $a_n+a_{n+1}=z$
Express $d$ in terms of $x,\,y,\,z,\,n$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We are given

$\sum_{k=1}^{n} a_{2k-1}^2 = x\cdots(1)$

$\sum_{k=1}^{n} a_{2k}^2 = y\cdots(2)$

Subtract (1) from (2) to get

$\sum_{k=1}^{n} (a_{2k}^2- a_{2k-1}^2) = y-x$

Or $\sum_{k=1}^{n} (a_{2k}- a_{2k-1})(a_{2k} + a_{2k-1}) = y-x$

But $(a_{2k}- a_{2k-1}= d)$ common difference so we get

$\sum_{k=1}^{n} d(a_{2k} + a_{2k-1}) = y-x$Or $d \sum_{k=1}^{n} (a_{2k} + a_{2k-1}) = y-x$Or $d \sum_{k=1}^{2n} (a_{k}) = y-x\cdots(3)$As $a_k = a_1 + (k-1) d$ for any k so we have$a_k + a_{2n+1-k} = a_1 + (k-1)d + a_1 + (2n+1-k-1)d = 2a_1 + (2n-1) d = = a_1 + a_1 + (2n-1) d = a_1 + a_{2n}$So $a_n + a_{n+1}d = a_1 + a_{2n} = z$So $a_k + a_{2n+1-k} = z$So$d \sum_{k=1}^{2n} (a_{k}) $
$= d \sum_{k=1}^{n} (a_{k} + a_{2n+1-k})$
$= d \sum_{k=1}^{n} z$
= dnz

So $dnz = y-x$

Or $d = \frac{y-x}{nz}$
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top