MHB [ASK] Exact Measure Using Two Bottles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
AI Thread Summary
To measure exactly 4 liters using a 5-liter and a 3-liter bottle, fill the 5-liter bottle and pour into the 3-liter bottle until it is full, leaving 2 liters in the 5-liter bottle. Empty the 3-liter bottle, then transfer the remaining 2 liters from the 5-liter bottle to the 3-liter bottle. Refill the 5-liter bottle and pour into the 3-liter bottle until it is full again, which will leave exactly 4 liters in the 5-liter bottle. This method demonstrates how to achieve various measurements using the two bottles effectively.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
Someone wants to take 4 liters of water, but he only has two 5-liters and 3-liters bottles. How is he able to measure 4 liters with only those bottles?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can in fact make any integer 1–8 litres of water using just those two bottles.

1 litre:
  • Fill up the 5ℓ bottle, and use it to fill up the 3ℓ bottle.
  • Empty the 3ℓ bottle, and transfer the contents of the other bottle to it.
  • Fill up the 5ℓ bottle again, and use to top up the 3ℓ bottle.
  • Empty the 3ℓ bottle, and fill it up again with the contents of the other bottle. There will now be exactly 1 litre of water in the 5ℓ bottle.

2 litres:
As for the 1-litre scenario, but stop after the first step. There will be exactly 2 litres of water in the 5ℓ bottle.

3 litres:
Just fill up the 3ℓ bottle.

4 litres:
As for the 1-litre scenario, but stop after the third step. There will be exactly 4 litres of water in the 5ℓ bottle.

5 litres:
Just fill up the 5ℓ bottle.

6 litres:
Fill up the 3ℓ bottle, empty it into the 5ℓ bottle, then fill up the 3ℓ bottle again. There will be a total of 6 litres of water in both bottles.

7 litres:
As for the 1-litre scenario, but after the second step just fill up the 5ℓ bottle. There will be a total of 7 litres of water in both bottles.

8 litres:
Fill up both bottles.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Olinguito!

Btw, I have remembered when I saw you in another forum. When I was browsing old threads at MIF, I saw your account there.
 
Yes, I’m on various forums (including some non-math ones). (Nod)
 
Which non-math forums are you in?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top