MHB [ASK] Probability with Factors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the probability of drawing two differently colored balls from a bag containing m white balls and n red balls, where mn equals 200 and m is greater than n. The probability of drawing two different colored balls is given as 40/87, leading to the equation 2mn/((m+n)(m+n-1)) = 40/87. Through factorization and solving for k, it is determined that m equals 20 and n equals 10, resulting in k being 30. The final calculation for 2m + 3n yields 80. The problem illustrates the application of probability in combinatorial contexts.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
In a bag there are m white balls and n red balls with mn = 200 and there are more white balls than red balls. If two balls are taken randomly at once and the probability of taking two different colored balls is $$\frac{40}{87}$$ then the value of 2m + 3n is ...
A. 30
B. 45
C. 50
D. 70
E. 80

Okay, so the possibility of m and n are like this:
m = 200 and n =1
m = 100 and n = 2
m = 50 and n = 4
m = 40 and n = 5
m = 25 and n = 8
m = 20 and n = 10

Do I need to count their probability one by one then adding them up to make $$\frac{40}{87}$$? Or am I not supposed to do that?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
P(two different colors) =

$\dfrac{m}{m+n} \cdot \dfrac{n}{m+n-1} + \dfrac{n}{m+n} \cdot \dfrac{m}{m+n-1} = \dfrac{40}{87}$

$\dfrac{2mn}{(m+n)(m+n-1)} = \dfrac{40}{87}$

$\dfrac{400}{k(k-1)} = \dfrac{40}{87}$, where $k = m+n$

$k = m+n = 30 \text{ and } mn = 200 \implies m = 20 \text{ and } n = 10$
 
Took me a while to understand that k = 30 comes from the factorization of $$k^2-k-870=0$$, but thank you. Now I understand. :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top