Astronomy - Main sequence and red giants

In summary, the main reason for the higher number of stars in the main sequence compared to red giants is the longer lifespan of moderate-low mass stars in the main sequence, which can last billions of years. Additionally, not all main sequence stars will become red giants, as they require a certain amount of mass to be born with or gained during their lifetimes.
  • #1
tosv
13
0
What is the main reason why there are so many more stars in the Main sequence in comparison with the number of red giants?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'd guess that the main sequence for moderate-low mass stars takes billions of years while the red giant phase is much much shorter. On the order of hundreds of millions to a billion or so years at most I think.
 
  • #3
I'd agree with Drakkith on that point, plus not all main sequence stars will ever be red giants. They have to be born with 0.5 to 10 Solar masses worth of matter, or have it added to them by a companion during their lives. Akin to finding a four leaf clover on one specific day of the year.
 
  • #4
Thanks for your replies!

I think my question have been answered now.
 
  • #5


The main reason for the larger number of stars in the main sequence compared to red giants is due to their different stages of evolution. Stars in the main sequence are in the early stage of their life cycle, where they are fusing hydrogen into helium in their core, releasing a large amount of energy and emitting visible light. This stage can last for billions of years, making it the longest phase in a star's life.

On the other hand, red giants are in the later stage of their life cycle, where they have exhausted their core's hydrogen fuel and have started to fuse helium into heavier elements. This fusion process causes the star's outer layers to expand, making it appear larger and cooler, hence the name "red giant." This phase is relatively short, lasting only a few million years.

Therefore, the large number of stars in the main sequence is a result of the long duration of this stage in a star's life. As stars age and move into the red giant phase, their numbers decrease, making them less common in the universe. Additionally, some stars may not even reach the red giant phase, as they may have lower masses and do not have enough fuel to undergo this expansion.

Overall, the difference in the number of stars in the main sequence and red giant phase is primarily due to the difference in their lifetimes. This highlights the importance of studying the main sequence, as it represents the most common and stable stage of a star's life.
 

FAQ: Astronomy - Main sequence and red giants

What is the main sequence in astronomy?

The main sequence in astronomy refers to the stage in a star's life cycle where it is actively fusing hydrogen into helium in its core. This is the longest and most stable stage of a star's life and is where the majority of stars, including our sun, fall on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram.

How do stars become red giants?

As a star's hydrogen fuel begins to deplete, its core contracts and heats up, causing the outer layers to expand and cool. This expansion and cooling is what causes a star to become a red giant. Red giants are larger and cooler than main sequence stars, and they have a reddish appearance due to their lower surface temperature.

How long does a star remain on the main sequence?

The length of time a star remains on the main sequence depends on its mass. More massive stars have shorter main sequence lifetimes, while lower mass stars can remain on the main sequence for billions of years. Our sun is estimated to spend about 10 billion years on the main sequence.

What happens to a star after it leaves the main sequence?

After a star exhausts its supply of hydrogen fuel and leaves the main sequence, it may go through several stages depending on its mass and composition. These stages can include becoming a red giant, fusing helium in its core, and eventually ending its life as a white dwarf, neutron star, or black hole.

Can red giants support life?

No, red giants are not able to support life as we know it. They have a much higher luminosity and surface temperature than our sun, which would make their planets too hot and uninhabitable. Additionally, red giants are unstable and can experience violent events like stellar flares and eruptions, making them even less suitable for life.

Similar threads

Back
Top