- #1
Dragrath
- 47
- 42
Hi I am Peter Clark currently a student at George Mason University (GMU). I have a BS in physics with a minor in astronomy and math from James Madison University (JMU) I have started to work with Dr. Yigit on the subject of atmospheric gravity waves interacting through multiple levels of planetary atmospheres. Mostly as the stage where have to read more and more papers to try and find those that are useful references which can be a daunting task. In particular it can be quite disparaging to see how poor some fits or even badly parameterized models lacking substance on a theoretical basis. Atmospheric gravity waves arise from the Navier Stokes equations which are quite hard as like all multivariate partial differential equations they lack a general solution and are highly dependent on initial conditions not to mention chaotic.
I have a wide interest in the natural sciences particularly interested in multidisciplinary connections as an area where I think my skill set is best able to apply at recognizing possible connections that are often overlooked. I have a more or less hobby of going off on research binges on various areas of science in particular always looking to correct my ignorance where possible typically through the lense of physics. I am inclined towards the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics as it avoids the special treatment of an observer at the cost of accepting we can't be nonobjective observers conceptually as the observer can become intertwined with a particular wave function. The possibility that we might be able to predict and respond before a quantum jump occurs as potentually game changing if true. I find the amount of information we have been able to learn about our planet's history fascinating and really enlightening on the role of evolution and extinctions.
I worry that there is a tendency in the public perception of the sciences to apply Occam's razor too broadly even after evidence strongly suggests that the simple solution in dogma isn't robust or allow biases to infiltrate. While it is important to science that hypothesis be constantly challenged I noticed this hasn't been conveyed to the general public very well especially in the current horrific state of political dysfunction. For instance the public still thinks in the binary sense that the asteroid or the volcanoes did the dinosaurs in rather than recignizing the compelling link between these phenomenon playing a causal role in the extinction. Or the whole misinformation campaign done to obscure the scientific consensus on the extent of the current climate crisis and biodiversity crisis. With the current attacks on science I have become a bit unsure of what is the best approach to contribute to society. I regularly read Scientific American, Physics Today, when I have time and admittedly when I don't as well. I help take care of the birdies by providing food and water for them in exchange for getting to see them and wish other people could better respect life I'm not sure what else to mention... Basically I live to learn and expand my horizons and perspective
I have a wide interest in the natural sciences particularly interested in multidisciplinary connections as an area where I think my skill set is best able to apply at recognizing possible connections that are often overlooked. I have a more or less hobby of going off on research binges on various areas of science in particular always looking to correct my ignorance where possible typically through the lense of physics. I am inclined towards the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics as it avoids the special treatment of an observer at the cost of accepting we can't be nonobjective observers conceptually as the observer can become intertwined with a particular wave function. The possibility that we might be able to predict and respond before a quantum jump occurs as potentually game changing if true. I find the amount of information we have been able to learn about our planet's history fascinating and really enlightening on the role of evolution and extinctions.
I worry that there is a tendency in the public perception of the sciences to apply Occam's razor too broadly even after evidence strongly suggests that the simple solution in dogma isn't robust or allow biases to infiltrate. While it is important to science that hypothesis be constantly challenged I noticed this hasn't been conveyed to the general public very well especially in the current horrific state of political dysfunction. For instance the public still thinks in the binary sense that the asteroid or the volcanoes did the dinosaurs in rather than recignizing the compelling link between these phenomenon playing a causal role in the extinction. Or the whole misinformation campaign done to obscure the scientific consensus on the extent of the current climate crisis and biodiversity crisis. With the current attacks on science I have become a bit unsure of what is the best approach to contribute to society. I regularly read Scientific American, Physics Today, when I have time and admittedly when I don't as well. I help take care of the birdies by providing food and water for them in exchange for getting to see them and wish other people could better respect life I'm not sure what else to mention... Basically I live to learn and expand my horizons and perspective