Average magnetic moment of atom in magnetic field ##B##

In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between the average energy and the canonical partition function for one atom. The goal is to show that ##\langle \mu \rangle = \beta^{-1} (\partial \log Z / \partial B)##, where ##Z## is the canonical partition function and ##\mu = \mu_0 m##. The conversation also mentions the Feynman-Hellman theorem as a way to link the two results.
  • #1
ergospherical
1,019
1,299
from the partition function - am trying to show that ##\langle \mu \rangle = \beta^{-1} (\partial \log Z / \partial B)## where ##Z## is the canonical partition function for one atom, i.e. ##Z = \sum_{m=-j}^{j} \mathrm{exp}(\mu_0 \beta B m)##, and ##\mu = \mu_0 m##. The average energy:\begin{align*}
\langle E \rangle = - \frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} \log Z
\end{align*}and ##\langle E \rangle = -\langle \mu \rangle B ##. How do I get the derivative ##\partial B/ \partial \beta## to link the two results? Or is there another way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I guess you mean ##H_{\text{mag}}=-\vec{\mu}_{\text{mag}} \cdot \vec{B}## in the Hamiltonian; unfortunately ##\mu## is already reserved for the chemical potential of some charge or particle-number like conserved quantity (or quantities).

Then your formula follows from the Feynman-Hellman theorem as usual.
 

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
876
Replies
1
Views
583
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
953
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
932
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
622
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
457
Back
Top