- #1
bigmike94
- 99
- 61
From experience how would you balance time on learning theory and problem solving?
Maybe learn the theory enough that if you got stuck on a difficult problem you would be able to understand the solution without scratching your head too much?
Im using University physics by young and freedman so obviously it’s very fast paced as it’s an intro book. so I’m not entirely convinced that if I just read the chapter and use no other outside learning source I’ll be able to remember how to apply the physics.
So instead I’ve sacrificed problem solving time with more theory. For example I only did around 15 problems on the conservative of energy chapter. Compared to over 80 problems on Newtons laws section.
But I know how much people stress that problem solving is by far the best way. (Given that you can check and compare your answers to learn from mistakes)
Im open to any suggestionsAlso a side question. In a standard university how long would the students spend on the intro mechanics chapters? Is it one semester?
Maybe learn the theory enough that if you got stuck on a difficult problem you would be able to understand the solution without scratching your head too much?
Im using University physics by young and freedman so obviously it’s very fast paced as it’s an intro book. so I’m not entirely convinced that if I just read the chapter and use no other outside learning source I’ll be able to remember how to apply the physics.
So instead I’ve sacrificed problem solving time with more theory. For example I only did around 15 problems on the conservative of energy chapter. Compared to over 80 problems on Newtons laws section.
But I know how much people stress that problem solving is by far the best way. (Given that you can check and compare your answers to learn from mistakes)
Im open to any suggestionsAlso a side question. In a standard university how long would the students spend on the intro mechanics chapters? Is it one semester?