- #1
Morgo
- 3
- 4
- TL;DR Summary
- Baryogenesis straw poll
Baryogenesis is a hypothesis. I'm curious as to how good an hypothesis it is generally considered? It states that anti-matter disappeared around the beginning of Universe formation, its not currently visible or apparently non detectable, so it must have gone.
Dark Matter is also not visible, and only vaguely detectable by gravitational proxy but it is considered 'still there'. Its location is uncertain, a locational uncertainty not allowed for in Baryogenesis.
How convincing is Baryogenesis then? I'm not particularly interested in debating it, its a hypothesis- its uncertainty is explicit, I'm only interested in a straw poll of its general consensus.
Dark Matter is also not visible, and only vaguely detectable by gravitational proxy but it is considered 'still there'. Its location is uncertain, a locational uncertainty not allowed for in Baryogenesis.
How convincing is Baryogenesis then? I'm not particularly interested in debating it, its a hypothesis- its uncertainty is explicit, I'm only interested in a straw poll of its general consensus.