- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
I am reading An Introduction to Rings and Modules With K-Theory in View by A.J. Berrick and M.E. Keating (B&K).
I need help to clarify a remark of B&K regarding ring homomorphisms from the zero or trivial ring ...
The relevant text from B&K reads as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6078
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6079In the above text from B&K's book we read ...
"... ... This follows from the observation that the obvious map from the zero ring to \(\displaystyle R\) is not a ring homomorphism (unless \(\displaystyle R\) itself happens to be \(\displaystyle 0\)). ... ... "
I do not understand the above statement that the obvious map from the zero ring to \(\displaystyle R\) is not a ring homomorphism (unless \(\displaystyle R\) itself happens to be \(\displaystyle 0\)) ... ... What, indeed do B&K mean by the obvious map from the zero ring to \(\displaystyle R\) ... ... ?It seems to me that the obvious map is a homomorphism ... ..Consider the rings \(\displaystyle T, R\) where \(\displaystyle T\) is the zero ring and \(\displaystyle R\) is any arbitrary ring ... so \(\displaystyle T = \{ 0 \}\) where \(\displaystyle 0 = 1\) ...
Then to me it seems that the "obvious" map is \(\displaystyle f( 0_T) = 0_R\) ... ... which seems to me to be a ring homomorphism ...
... BUT ... this must be wrong ... but why ... ?
Can someone please clarify the above for me ...
Some help will be very much appreciated ...
Peter
I need help to clarify a remark of B&K regarding ring homomorphisms from the zero or trivial ring ...
The relevant text from B&K reads as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6078
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6079In the above text from B&K's book we read ...
"... ... This follows from the observation that the obvious map from the zero ring to \(\displaystyle R\) is not a ring homomorphism (unless \(\displaystyle R\) itself happens to be \(\displaystyle 0\)). ... ... "
I do not understand the above statement that the obvious map from the zero ring to \(\displaystyle R\) is not a ring homomorphism (unless \(\displaystyle R\) itself happens to be \(\displaystyle 0\)) ... ... What, indeed do B&K mean by the obvious map from the zero ring to \(\displaystyle R\) ... ... ?It seems to me that the obvious map is a homomorphism ... ..Consider the rings \(\displaystyle T, R\) where \(\displaystyle T\) is the zero ring and \(\displaystyle R\) is any arbitrary ring ... so \(\displaystyle T = \{ 0 \}\) where \(\displaystyle 0 = 1\) ...
Then to me it seems that the "obvious" map is \(\displaystyle f( 0_T) = 0_R\) ... ... which seems to me to be a ring homomorphism ...
... BUT ... this must be wrong ... but why ... ?
Can someone please clarify the above for me ...
Some help will be very much appreciated ...
Peter