- #1
ttn
- 735
- 15
I've argued here in the past (with dr chinese and others) about what, exactly, is proved by Bell's Theorem. Here is a new paper which addresses
and clarifies many of those points:
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0601205
I suspect it will be of interest to people here. But before Patrick jumps on me about MWI, I'll just say this: I am taking it as given that the measurement in each wing of these EPR/Bell correlation experiements has a definite outcome. Given that reasonable assumption, the conclusions in the paper follow. But if one holds (with MWI) that these experiments do not have definite outcomes, all bets are off.
and clarifies many of those points:
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0601205
I suspect it will be of interest to people here. But before Patrick jumps on me about MWI, I'll just say this: I am taking it as given that the measurement in each wing of these EPR/Bell correlation experiements has a definite outcome. Given that reasonable assumption, the conclusions in the paper follow. But if one holds (with MWI) that these experiments do not have definite outcomes, all bets are off.