Berezin's correspondance of (anti-)symmetric function with functional

Tschijnmo
1
0
Hi all, I have recently been reading the book ``The Method of Second Quantization'' by Felix Berezin but I got trapped on just page 4, where the concept of generating functionals is introduced. It seems to be assigning each (anti-) symmetric function of N variables with a functional of a function of just the degrees of freedom of one of the particles. And in the last sentence of the page, it is commented that ``Knowing the functional \Phi(a^*) and \tilde{A}(a^*, a), one can obviously construct the vector \Phi and the operator \tilde{A}''. But even after a serious amont of thinking, I am still not able to be the obviousness here. Google search did not seem to have yielded some clear answer. Even the book seems to have been highly cited, but I really cannot find a detailed explanation to it. Could someone here give me some guidance? Thank you so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tschijnmo said:
Hi all, I have recently been reading the book ``The Method of Second Quantization'' by Felix Berezin but I got trapped on just page 4, where the concept of generating functionals is introduced. It seems to be assigning each (anti-) symmetric function of N variables with a functional of a function of just the degrees of freedom of one of the particles. And in the last sentence of the page, it is commented that ``Knowing the functional ##\Phi(a^*)## and ##\tilde{A}(a^*, a)##, one can obviously construct the vector ##\hat\Phi## and the operator ##\tilde{A}##''. But even after a serious amount of thinking, I am still not able to be the obviousness here.
That book is a difficult study, as Berezin assumes quite a lot of the reader.

The stuff on page 4 you mentioned is part of an "introduction". A more detailed explanation follows in chapter 1 (though, as I look through it, I can't help thinking there must be more helpful ways of presenting this stuff).

Given the in Berezin's eq(0.10), i.e.,

we want to extract the components of the vector in eq(0.1) which consists of the various functions in the integrand. This is usually done with the help of a functional derivative. E.g., to extract , use a single functional derivative like this:

This uses

(i.e., a Dirac delta on the right hand side). This extracts one term from the sum of integrals, and all the others vanish after applying as the last step.

For higher order we use higher order functional derivatives, apply the Leibniz product rule carefully when differentiating the integrands (which results in a factor of , iirc), and possibly introduce an extra factor of somewhere to compensate.

I hope that's enough to give you the basic idea. Such use of functional differentiation is very common when working with generating functionals.
 
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top