- #106
tom aaron
- 124
- 38
Ryan_m_b said:Actually they may be economical, one of the reasons the NS Savannah was decomissioned is because of how cheap shipping fuel was back then, apparently even by the 70s fuel costs had risen enough that Savannah would have been cheaper:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NS_Savannah#Economics_of_nuclear_propulsion
Not at all. The capital costs, decommissioning, shipping restrictions make it completely uneconomical. A money pit compared to conventional energy use.
Where do you see it being used today? Why not?