- #1
Varon
- 548
- 1
Biochemistry doesn't use the concept of wave functions because biochemistry deal with big things that are much larger than the quantum realm. But isn't it that stochastic quantum process can affect the probability of certain occurences that can amplitude up and affect Biochemistry? Chaos and non-linear process can amplify via the butterfly effect. Now to what extend is this overcrowded by thermally driven Brownian motions? And can the quantum indeterminacy cause macroscopic effect? Perhaps when the average of Brownian motions and quantum indeterminacy is added. It can affect the macrostate by the different microstate changes.
I'm asking this because Stapp proposed that the mind external to the brain can affect quantum indeterminacy and bias it in such a way that the macrostate is affect by the influence of the mind on the microstate causing the brain and body to act in certain ways. Now I wrote this so someone can overwhelmingly refute Stapp by arguing that brownian motions would always rule and no amount of quantum indeterminacy and biasing and influence can overtake the brownian motions in Biochemistry. Is this correct just for this argument (ignoring Stapp speculations). I want the definite arguments that thermal motions overtake any quantum input no matter how large is the quantum biasing of influence. Thanks.
I'm asking this because Stapp proposed that the mind external to the brain can affect quantum indeterminacy and bias it in such a way that the macrostate is affect by the influence of the mind on the microstate causing the brain and body to act in certain ways. Now I wrote this so someone can overwhelmingly refute Stapp by arguing that brownian motions would always rule and no amount of quantum indeterminacy and biasing and influence can overtake the brownian motions in Biochemistry. Is this correct just for this argument (ignoring Stapp speculations). I want the definite arguments that thermal motions overtake any quantum input no matter how large is the quantum biasing of influence. Thanks.