Body on a spring: expression for the period T

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the period of vertical oscillations for a mass m suspended from springs with varying configurations. For a single spring, the period T is expressed as T = 2 π √(m / k). When two identical springs are arranged in series, the effective spring constant is halved, leading to a period of T = 2 π √(m / (k / 2)). In contrast, when the springs are placed in parallel, the effective spring constant doubles, resulting in a period of T = 2 π √(m / (2k)). The calculations confirm that the changes in spring configuration directly affect the period of oscillation.
moenste
Messages
711
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


(a) A body of mass m is suspended from a vertical, light, helical spring of force constant k, as in Fig. 1. Write down an expression for the period T of vertical oscillations of m.

(b) Two such identical springs are now joined as in Fig. 2 and support the same mass m. In terms of T, what is the period of vertical oscillations in this case?

(c) The identical springs are now placed side by side as in Fig. 3, and m is supported symmetrically from them by means of a weightless bar. In terms of T, what is the period of vertical oscillations in this case?

2bda1af4ce78.jpg


2. The attempt at a solution
(a) The first figure looks like a basic example of a body on a spring and it's period should be: T = 2 π √(m / k).

(b) Since there are two identical springs, I would say that their force constant k should be less, because the spring is longer now: T = 2 π √(m / (k / 2)).

(c) Since the two springs are in parallel, the force constant k should be twice as much: T = 2 π √(m / (2k)).

I am not sure for the (b) and (c) parts. If we take the (a) formula as the basis, the only thing (as I see it) that changes is k due to the different spring positions. So, for (b) it should be (k / 2) and for (c) 2k. I am going in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
moenste said:
If we take the (a) formula as the basis, the only thing (as I see it) that changes is k due to the different spring positions. So, for (b) it should be (k / 2) and for (c) 2k. I am going in the right direction?
Exactly right! :thumbup:
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K