Boiling a glass of water in a bowl of water - tricky question?

In summary, an insulating glass with a double-shell will prevent the water in the bowl from cooling down, leading to two boiling points.
  • #1
Physics Slayer
26
8
Homework Statement
A glass of water is placed in a bowl of water, each are filled till the brim, the glass of water floats in the bowl. The bowl is heated, when will the water in the glass boil? before/after/same time as the water in the the bowl.
Relevant Equations
no equations
I think the water in the bowl of water will boil first because the glass won't conduct the heat instantaneously, and hence the water in the glass will boil after the water in the bowl. Is this correct?

I am guessing this is a trick question and the water in both boil at the same time, but I don't see how that would be possible.
(I don't know the correct answer)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
or is it that both will boil at the same time because change of state happens at a constant temp. and as long as the water in the glass is not at 100deg C, the water in the bowl will keep cooling down by loosing heat to the water in the glass and hence only when they are both at the same temp. the water will be able to boil from the bowl and along with that from the glass as well. does this reasoning make sense?
 
  • #3
Physics Slayer said:
A glass of water is placed in a bowl of water, each are filled till the brim, the glass of water floats in the bowl.
That's a good trick right there considering that the density of glass is higher than that of water.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Steve4Physics
  • #4
phinds said:
That's a good trick right there considering that the density of glass is higher than that of water.
So clearly the glass is one of those insulating glasses with a double shell and an air space in between. (I have two.) That should settle the question.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Physics Slayer and Steve4Physics
  • #5
haruspex said:
So clearly the glass is one of those insulating glasses with a double shell and an air space in between. (I have two.) That should settle the question.
Uh huh. You really think that's what the OP had in mind? :smile:
 
  • #6
Physics Slayer said:
I think the water in the bowl of water will boil first because the glass won't conduct the heat instantaneously, and hence the water in the glass will boil after the water in the bowl. Is this correct?
@haruspex’s (amusing) reply in Post #4 highlights a useful general 'trick' for some problems.

Imagine what would happen in an extreme case. So here, imagine the ‘glass’ is not simply a poor thermal conductor, but is an extremely poor conductor.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #7
Like a vacuum. And then we could put areflective coating on the glass!

The point here is (I think) that temperature is really only well defined for a system at equilibrium. The system defined is being heated and might be in steady state but it is not in equilibrium. Perhaps subsections of it can rou8ghly equilibrate
 
  • #8
A pal of mine went ahead and actually did the experiment and found out that they infact do not boil at the same time. He actually put a small bowl(made of steel) in a larger bowl(again made of steel)

Whenever I face questions like this where you can't really apply equations(can you?) I don't see a straightforward method of solving the problem do I just rely on Intuition?(which really just feels like guess work with extra steps)
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
  • #9
Fluids heat by convection and conduction. An internal boundary will interfere with convection. The internal boundary will take a finite amount of time to reach the bath temperature, so the fluid inside of it will also see a time lag. So the fluid in the inner area will boil later.

I am guessing that convection is the larger effect, so it would be an interesting experiment if the small steel bowl was replaced by foil.
 
  • Like
Likes Physics Slayer
  • #10
If one cleans the inner surface of the outer bowl and the outer surface of the inner glass well and uses distilled water in the outer bowl but ordinary tap water in the inner bowl then it ought to be possible to get the inner glass to boil first. That would be a mildly amusing parlor trick.

But back to the situation at hand.

How does the rate of heat transfer change as the inner reservoir heats up toward the boiling point? Can two reservoirs in thermal contact ever equilibriate in finite time?
 
  • Like
Likes Physics Slayer
  • #11
jbriggs444 said:
distilled water in the outer bowl but ordinary tap water in the inner bowl
or maybe the other way round? In any case the difference in boiling points is so small it would be very difficult to achieve in practice.

jbriggs444 said:
But back to the situation at hand.
Where we must assume that the boiling point of the water inside the glass is identical to that of the water outside the glass.

In this case you only need to consider this:
jbriggs444 said:
How does the rate of heat transfer change as the inner reservoir heats up toward the boiling point? Can two reservoirs in thermal contact ever equilibriate in finite time?
to know the answer, although there is another reason that is more important in practice.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
pbuk said:
In any case the difference in boiling points is so small it would be very difficult to achieve in practice.
Impurities raise the temp a couple of degrees. You could cheat and dissolve salt/sugar. I do not know which is better.
 
  • #13
Physics Slayer said:
Homework Statement:: A glass of water is placed in a bowl of water, each are filled till the brim, the glass of water floats in the bowl. The bowl is heated, when will the water in the glass boil? before/after/same time as the water in the the bowl.
Relevant Equations:: no equations

I think the water in the bowl of water will boil first because the glass won't conduct the heat instantaneously, and hence the water in the glass will boil after the water in the bowl. Is this correct?

I am guessing this is a trick question and the water in both boil at the same time, but I don't see how that would be possible.
(I don't know the correct answer)
Both they will boil in the same Temperature but different Time.
 
  • #14
Physics Slayer said:
Whenever I face questions like this where you can't really apply equations(can you?)
There is an equation (related to thermal conductivity) that can be used. But using it would be an unnecessarily complicated way to solve a simple problem like this
.
Physics Slayer said:
I don't see a straightforward method of solving the problem do I just rely on Intuition?(which really just feels like guess work with extra steps)
One of my first physics lessons at school (aged 11, many years ago) involved a demo’ showing us that conduction of heat takes time. Something like this (turn the sound down and skip through it).:


Knowing this, and that water must be heated to 100ºC to boil (at atmospheric pressure), you can answer the question with only simple logic.
 
  • Like
Likes Physics Slayer
  • #15
You will get the right answer by looking at conduction, but for the wrong reason. Convection is much more significant than conduction when boiling a liquid in an open pan.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
  • #16
pbuk said:
You will get the right answer by looking at conduction, but for the wrong reason. Convection is much more significant than conduction when boiling a liquid in an open pan.
Good point. So the glass acts as a barrier to limit convection (as well as its less significant conduction effect).

Would that mean even some sort of 'ideal' perfectly conducting glass will reduce the overall rate of heat transfer to the water in the glass? I guess so.
 
  • #17
No matter what, it's the same answer whether the section you're studying concerns heat transfer, specific/latent heats, or sous vide cooking.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Steve4Physics said:
There is an equation (related to thermal conductivity) that can be used. But using it would be an unnecessarily complicated way to solve a simple problem like this
Could you link the wiki page for the equation you talk about, even though I might not have the math background yet, I would absolutely love to have a curious glance at it!
 
  • #19
caz said:
Impurities raise the temp a couple of degrees. You could cheat and dissolve salt/sugar. I do not know which is better.
Lack of nucleation points raises the temperature a fair bit more.
 
  • #20
Physics Slayer said:
Homework Statement:: A glass of water is placed in a bowl of water, each are filled till the brim, the glass of water floats in the bowl. The bowl is heated, when will the water in the glass boil? before/after/same time as the water in the the bowl.
Relevant Equations:: no equations

I think the water in the bowl of water will boil first because the glass won't conduct the heat instantaneously, and hence the water in the glass will boil after the water in the bowl. Is this correct?

I am guessing this is a trick question and the water in both boil at the same time, but I don't see how that would be possible.
(I don't know the correct answer)
The fluid furthest away from the heat source is coolest, boils last.
 
  • #21
jbriggs444 said:
Lack of nucleation points raises the temperature a fair bit more.
Do you have a number? I cannot seem to find one.

I would think the boundary would put an upper limit to the value. I believe that superheating occurs in a microwave because the container acts as a heat sink while the bulk is heated. For the geometry of this thread, the hottest part is the bottom of the bowl (which is why you suggested cleaning it).
 
  • #22
Physics Slayer said:
Could you link the wiki page for the equation you talk about, even though I might not have the math background yet, I would absolutely love to have a curious glance at it!
I’m no expert so I can only give a few pointers on the maths (and only considering conduction, not convection).

Heat transfer by conduction is governed by Fourier’s Law (also referred to by other names such as Fourier’s Heat Equation). E,g, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conduction#Fourier's_law

This is simply a starting point. In your problem, the temperatures are changing; we say we are not in a ‘steady state’. The process of heat-transfer while temperatures change is called ‘transient heat transfer’ and makes applying Fourier’s law much harder.

For a general (non-mathematical) description of transient heat conduction try this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conduction#Transient_conduction

For some mathematics (with one of the temperatures kept constant - a much simpler situation than your glass problem) try this (a pdf file):
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwj6t7nCj9_1AhWPY8AKHbeeBjMQFnoECDEQAQ&url=https://www.sfu.ca/~mbahrami/ENSC%20388/Notes/Transient%20Heat%20Conduction.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3_Zc-t9iwQqQM8ZaUdWSBE
 

FAQ: Boiling a glass of water in a bowl of water - tricky question?

Can you really boil a glass of water in a bowl of water?

Yes, it is possible to boil a glass of water in a bowl of water. This is because the boiling point of water remains the same regardless of the container it is in.

How does the glass not break when boiling in water?

The glass does not break because the water surrounding it helps to distribute the heat evenly, preventing any one spot from getting too hot and causing the glass to break.

Is it safe to boil a glass of water in a bowl of water?

As long as the glass is heat-resistant and there are no cracks or chips in the glass, it is safe to boil a glass of water in a bowl of water. However, it is important to handle the hot glass with caution to avoid burns.

Will the water in the bowl boil faster with the glass inside?

No, the presence of the glass will not affect the boiling time of the water in the bowl. The boiling time is determined by the amount of water and the heat source, not by the presence of the glass.

Can I use any type of glass to boil in water?

No, it is important to use a heat-resistant glass, such as borosilicate glass, when boiling in water. Other types of glass may not be able to withstand the high temperatures and could break or shatter.

Similar threads

Back
Top