Box pushing against another box (conceptual)

  • Thread starter Thread starter subwaybusker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Conceptual
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interaction between two boxes, Box A (4 kg) and Box B (20 kg), as Box A accelerates and pushes against Box B. It confirms that the force exerted by Box A on Box B is equal to the force exerted by Box B on Box A, adhering to Newton's third law. The boxes do not stop because the action-reaction forces act on different bodies and do not cancel each other out. The net force required to accelerate both boxes is determined to be 96N, with Box B experiencing an 80N force from Box A. The remaining 16N is the net force acting on Box A, illustrating that the forces involved are part of a larger system of motion.
subwaybusker
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Let's say Box A is 4 kg. It is accelerating and pushing against Box B, which is 20kg, is the force of A on B equal to the force of B on A?

My gut instinct tells me the answer should be yes, but I don't understand why the boxes haven't stopped since the action-reaction forces cancel each other out. Also, does it make any difference if Box A is accelerating or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
subwaybusker said:
… but I don't understand why the boxes haven't stopped since the action-reaction forces cancel each other out.…

Hi subwaybusker! :smile:

(you're right … this is a reaction force … so good ol' Newton's third law always applies)

Whether the boxes stop (or, to be precise, stop accelerating :wink:) depends on the total force …

how much force is on the other side of A, making it accelerate? :smile:
 
but if there is more force coming from the 4kg, then wouldn't the action force be greater than the reaction force?
 
subwaybusker said:
but if there is more force coming from the 4kg, then wouldn't the action force be greater than the reaction force ?

The box won't accelerate unless there is more force on the left.

Write out the F = ma equations for the first box, and for both boxes together, and you'll see how it works. :smile:
 
let's say the acceleration of both boxes is 4m/s^{2}
there is a force that is moving both boxes, so F=(24)(4)=96N
and for 20kg, F=(20)(4)=80N
so, the action and reaction forces are 80N and you can only determine it from Box B?
and the extra 16N is what is moving the boxes? and this 16N wouldn't be counted as the action force?
 
subwaybusker said:
Let's say Box A is 4 kg. It is accelerating and pushing against Box B, which is 20kg, is the force of A on B equal to the force of B on A?

My gut instinct tells me the answer should be yes, but I don't understand why the boxes haven't stopped since the action-reaction forces cancel each other out. Also, does it make any difference if Box A is accelerating or not?
Action-reaction forces never "cancel out" since they act on different bodies.

subwaybusker said:
let's say the acceleration of both boxes is 4m/s^{2}
there is a force that is moving both boxes, so F=(24)(4)=96N
Good. That's the net force on both boxes taken together. It's also the force that is applied to one side of box A.
and for 20kg, F=(20)(4)=80N
This is the net force on box B, which happens to be the force exerted on it by box A.
so, the action and reaction forces are 80N and you can only determine it from Box B?
The action-reaction forces between A and B are 80N. You could also determine it from the net force on box A. That net force must be (4)(4) = 16N. Since the applied force to one side of box A is 96N, the force from box B must be 80N in order to make the net force come out right.
and the extra 16N is what is moving the boxes? and this 16N wouldn't be counted as the action force?
The 16N is just the net force on box A. Since there's no object exerting a 16N force, it's not part of an action-reaction pair.

You can think of it like this. You need to push with 96N to accelerate those boxes. But since only 16N (net) is needed for box A, there's a force of 80N "transmitted" to box B.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top