MHB B's question at Yahoo Answers involving a solid of revolution

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Revolution Solid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the volume of a solid formed by rotating a region bounded by the equations x=16-(y-3)^2 and x+y=7 about the x-axis. Two methods are presented: the shell method and the washer method. The shell method yields a volume of V=2401π/6, while the washer method results in V=4802π/5, although there is a noted error in the rotation axis in the latter calculation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the axis of rotation for accurate volume computation. Overall, the thread provides a detailed mathematical approach to solving the problem.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Find the volume V of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by x=16-(y-3)^2, x+y=7 about the x-axis?

Here is a link to the original question:

Find the volume V of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by x=16-(y-3)^2, x+y=7 about the x-axis? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.

First, let's take a look at the region to be revolved:

View attachment 547

As we can see, it will be cleaner to consider the shell method.

The volume of an arbitrary shell is:

$\displaystyle dV=2\pi rh\,dy$

$\displaystyle r=t$

$\displaystyle h=\left(16-(y-3)^2 \right)-(7-y)=7y-y^2$

and so we have:

$\displaystyle dV=2\pi y(7y-y^2)\,dy=2\pi(7y^2-y^3)\,dy$

Now, to determine the limits of integration, we want to find the roots of:

$\displaystyle h(y)=0$

$\displaystyle 7y-y^2=0$

$\displaystyle y(7-y)=0$

$\displaystyle y=0,\,7$

And so, summing the shells by integration, we find:

$\displaystyle V=2\pi\int_0^7(7y^2-y^3)\,dy=2\pi\left[\frac{7}{3}y^3-\frac{1}{4}y^4 \right]_0^7=2\pi\cdot7^4\left(\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{4} \right)=\frac{7^4\pi}{6}=\frac{2401\pi}{6}$
 

Attachments

  • BVolume.jpg
    BVolume.jpg
    9.8 KB · Views: 83
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I tend to prefer the method of washers. The volume can be calculated as

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} V &= \int_0^7{\pi \left[ 16 - (y - 3)^2 \right]^2 \, dy} - \int_0^7 {\pi \left( 7 - y \right)^2 \,dy} \\ &= \pi \int_0^7{ y^4 - 12y^3 + 22y^2 + 84y + 49 \,dy } - \pi \int_0^7{ 49 - 14y + y^2 \, dy } \\ &= \pi \int_0^7{ y^4 - 12y^3 + 21y^2 + 98y \,dy } \\ &= \pi \left[ \frac{y^5}{5} - 3y^4 + 7y^3 + 49y^2 \right]_0^7 \\ &= \pi \left[ \left( \frac{16\, 087}{5} - 7203 + 2401 + 2401 \right) - \left( \frac{0}{5} - 0 + 0 + 0 \right) \right] \\ &= \frac{4802\pi}{5} \end{align*}$

Edit: It appears I rotated this around the y-axis instead of the x. Hope it was helpful anyway :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
11K
Back
Top