Neutrons are emitted from the fusion reaction (d,t) => 14.1 MeV neutrons, or 50% of (d,d) fusions => few MeV neutrons. If there is no fusion, then it's pretty pointless to build a fusor.Kevin_Axion said:Farnsworth Fusors don't emit neutron radiation, supposedly. What easier to make and safer, Polywells or Farnsworth Fusors?
Well - one would ionize air and produce heat, infrared radiation, visible light, UV and possibly low energy X-rays depending on the potential. One will not however obtain fusion reactions.Kevin_Axion said:What if you just use air?
A Farnsworth Fusor is a high-vacuum device that uses an electric field to heat and compress a gas, creating a plasma. It was invented by Philo T. Farnsworth in the 1960s and was initially intended for nuclear fusion experiments.
A Farnsworth Fusor works by using a high-voltage electric field to accelerate positively charged particles (ions) towards a negatively charged central electrode. As the ions collide with each other in the center, they can fuse together, releasing energy.
Yes, it is possible to build a Farnsworth Fusor at home with the right materials and equipment. However, it can be a complex and potentially dangerous project, so it is important to thoroughly research and understand the process before attempting it.
The basic materials needed to build a Farnsworth Fusor include a high-voltage power supply, a vacuum pump, a vacuum chamber, and various electrodes and insulators. Some additional materials, such as deuterium gas, may also be needed for plasma experiments.
No, a Farnsworth Fusor is not capable of producing sustainable fusion energy. It is a demonstration of the concept of nuclear fusion and can produce small amounts of fusion reactions, but it is not a practical source of energy due to its low efficiency and high energy input requirements.