Bungee jump | simple harmonic motion

AI Thread Summary
A bungee jump involves a cord that stretches from its natural length of 75 meters to 83 meters when a person is attached. The discussion centers on when the cord goes slack, with some arguing it occurs when the length is less than 75 meters, while others believe it should be less than 83 meters due to the weight of the jumper. Clarification reveals that the cord remains taut as long as it is stretched beyond 75 meters, regardless of the jumper's weight. The tension in the cord decreases as the length approaches 75 meters, leading to the conclusion that slack occurs below this threshold. Understanding the mechanics of tension and stretching is crucial for grasping the dynamics of bungee jumping.
DarkEnergy890
Messages
14
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Bungee jump | simple harmonic motion
Relevant Equations
No maths involved
As you all know, a bungee jump is where a person is tied to a cord and the person jumps off and bounces up again.

The natural length of a cord is 75 metres. Then when a person is attached onto the cord, the length becomes 83 metres when the person is at rest. I am sure that the person is not executing simple harmonic motion because the cord goes slack at some point. My question is that does the cord go slack when the length of the cord is < 75 metres, or when the length of the cord is < 83 metres?

In the solutions it said that it goes slack when the cord is < 75 metres. However, it makes more sense to me that the cord goes slack < 83 metres because 83 metres was its natural length when the man is attached on to the cord (due to the man's weight). Any help with understanding this is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome, @DarkEnergy890 !

Why the difference between 83 and 75 meters?
Why not more or less than that value?
What would it be for a heavier or lighter person?
 
Think about tension in the cord and how it relates to slack.
 
Lnewqban said:
Welcome, @DarkEnergy890 !

Why the difference between 83 and 75 meters?
Why not more or less than that value?
What would it be for a heavier or lighter person?
Hi, thanks for the reply. Sorry if my question was unclear. The length is 75m if nobody is on it. Then when a "certain human" is attached the length increases to 83m.

Edit: Ah, I see what you mean. When the person is attached to the cord the cord has already been stretched. So no matter what the weight of the person is as long as the length is > 75m then the cord will not go slack, but rather it will "decompress".
 
DarkEnergy890 said:
Edit: Ah, I see what you mean. When the person is attached to the cord the cord has already been stretched. So no matter what the weight of the person is as long as the length is > 75m then the cord will not go slack, but rather it will "decompress".
Precisely!
 
  • Like
Likes DarkEnergy890
DarkEnergy890 said:
Hi, thanks for the reply. Sorry if my question was unclear. The length is 75m if nobody is on it. Then when a "certain human" is attached the length increases to 83m.

Edit: Ah, I see what you mean. When the person is attached to the cord the cord has already been stretched. So no matter what the weight of the person is as long as the length is > 75m then the cord will not go slack, but rather it will "decompress".
Exactly!
At 76 meters, there is still some fraction of the weight force acting on the cord and stretching it a little.
At 74 meters, the cord does not “feel” anything attached to any of its ends.
 
  • Like
Likes DarkEnergy890
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top