Bungee Jump-Springs and Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Furby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bungee Energy
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a bungee jumping physics problem involving a 90kg jumper from an 80m high bridge with a 25m bungee cord and a spring constant of 30 N/m. The calculations show that the jumper's potential energy and kinetic energy interplay until the bungee cord stretches, leading to a quadratic equation that suggests the jumper would hit the water. The conclusion indicates a possible error in the spring constant, suggesting it may need to be 300 N/m instead of 30 N/m for the problem to make sense. Participants confirm the calculations are accurate but highlight the inconsistency in the numbers provided. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correct parameters in physics problems.
Furby
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Bungee Jump--Springs and Energy

Homework Statement



A person bungee jumps off a bridge.
The person's mass is 90kg.
The height of the bridge above the water is 80m.
The bungee chord has a length of 25m.
The bungee chord's spring constant is 30 N/m.
What is the minimum distance the person will be from the surface of the water?

Homework Equations



PEs=1/2*k*x2
PEg=m*g*h

The Attempt at a Solution



I assigned the point of jump at the height of the bridge as y=0, thus as the jumper falls his PEg increases, becoming more negative. Kinetic energy is growing at the same rate until 25m, the chord's equilibrium point, where the chord will begin to stretch and exert a force on the jumper opposite to gravity.

Afterwards the kinetic energy begins to convert to PEs always growing in equal value to the constantly increasing PEg. Thus at the end, or 'bottom' of the person's jump, he will no longer have any KE, and thus:

mgh=1/2*kx2
h=25+x

Use some algebra and you get a quadratic:

15x2-882x-22050=0

x=77.715m

Which add the initial 25m and you get 102m, obviously exceeding the 80m height. The bungee jumper would then easily hit the water. I solved the problem another way assigning y=0 at the point of greatest KE (25m) and set PEg to be 0 at this point as well, and received the same answer.

My first assumption is that there was a typo and the problem is intended to have a 300 N/m spring constant, but I'm curious to see if I did anything wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


That is correct. My TA did the same problem in discussion today. Do you go to OSU?
 


It looks spot-on, just some bad numbers.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K