BxB, sets question, need to verify if this is right.

  • Thread starter mr_coffee
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sets
In summary, P stands for power sets, and X stands for Cartesian Product. AxA, AxB, BxB, etc. are ordered sets. Remember that AxA, AxB, BxB, etc. are ordered sets.
  • #1
mr_coffee
1,629
1
Hello everyone, i was wondering if this is correct or not.
I circled the 2 I was iffy about. Thanks!
Note: P stands for power sets, and X stands for Cartesian Product

http://suprfile.com/src/1/3m7bfrq/lastscan.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The two you circled are, in fact, wrong.
 
  • #3
Remember that AxA, AxB, BxB, etc. are ordered sets.
 
  • #4
Remember that AxA, AxB, BxB, etc. are ordered sets.
:confused:
 
  • #5
I went over the chapter again and I still can't see what I did wrong, especially in the above one where I'm finding the power set. Can you give me some feedback on why its wrong or how I can correct it?

For the BxB would it just be B? {a,b}?
 
  • #6
You want to take the power set of
[tex]\{\phi, \{\phi\}\}[/tex]
It may be a little less confusing if you instead try to find the power set of {x, y} where x = [tex]\phi[/tex] and y = [tex]\{\phi\}[/tex], then substitute back.
in the second one you want to find {a, b} x {a, b}. Can you find {a, b} x {c, d} and then let c = a, d = b?
In these one thing to check is the size of the set in your answer. If A and B are finite, |P(A)| = 2|A| and |A x B| = |A| x |B|
 
Last edited:
  • #7
HallsofIvy said:
Remember that AxA, AxB, BxB, etc. are ordered sets.
What a remarkably stupid thing for me to say! It must have been past my bedtime. AxA, AxB, BxB, etc. are sets of ordered pairs. In other words, if a, b are both in B, BxB will contain both (a,b) and (b,a).
 
  • #8
Thanks for the responces...
In other words, if a, b are both in B, BxB will contain both (a,b) and (b,a).
So it would just be BxB = { (a,b), (b,a) } ?
Why wouldn't it include any of the others? like
BxB = {(a,a),(a,b),(b,a),(b,b) }
If BXB is an ordered pair that means AXB is, and when you do AXB in this example you do a lot more grouping like for instance:

A = {x,y,z,w}
B = {a,b}
AxB = { (x,a), (y,a),(z,a),(w,a),(x,b),(y,b),(z,b),(w,b) }
You group up each A element with a B.
So why wouldn't u also do that with BxB? group each B element with itself?
(a,a),(b,b),(a,b),(b,a)

Ortho with ur hint,
to let c = a, d = b. i get the following:
{a,b} x {c, d} = { (a, c), (a, d), (b, c), (b, d) }
now sub back in
BxB = { (a, a), (a, b), (b, a), (b, b) }
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Also for the power sets i took ur advice ortho and got the following:

P({null,{null}})
let x = null
let y = {null}
P({x,y}) = {null,{x},{y},{x,y}}
now sub in for x and y and i got:
P({x,y}) = {null,{null}, { {null} }, { null,{null} } }
 
  • #10
BxB = { (a, a), (a, b), (b, a), (b, b) }
P({x,y}) = {null,{null}, { {null} }, { null,{null} } }
Those are both right.
 
  • #11
o yeah! thanks for the help again!
:biggrin:
 

FAQ: BxB, sets question, need to verify if this is right.

What is BxB in scientific terms?

BxB is a common notation used in scientific research and stands for "between-subjects by between-subjects". It refers to a study design where participants are randomly assigned to different experimental conditions.

How is BxB different from other study designs?

Unlike within-subjects or mixed design studies, BxB designs do not involve repeated measures or multiple levels of manipulation. Instead, each participant is exposed to only one condition, making it easier to isolate the effects of the independent variable.

How do I set up a BxB study?

To set up a BxB study, researchers need to first identify the independent variable(s) they want to manipulate and the dependent variable(s) they want to measure. Then, participants are randomly assigned to different conditions, with each condition representing a unique combination of independent variables.

What are the advantages of using a BxB design?

BxB designs are useful for studying complex relationships between variables, as they allow researchers to control for potential confounding factors. They also allow for a more straightforward analysis of results, as each participant is only exposed to one condition.

Are there any limitations to using a BxB design?

One limitation of BxB designs is that they require a larger sample size compared to within-subjects designs, as each participant can only contribute data to one condition. This can make BxB studies more expensive and time-consuming to conduct.

Back
Top