∑ C An =C ∑ An (n from 1 to infinity) ... why?

  • Thread starter ShengyaoLiang
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Infinity
In summary, if ∑ C An (n from 1 to infinity) converges, and C in Real, then ∑ C An is convergent with :-The partial sum of the first series converges.-The partial sum of the second series also converges, because the limit of its partial sum is equal to the sum of the first series and the second series.
  • #1
ShengyaoLiang
23
0
If ∑ C An (n from 1 to infinity) converges, and C in Real, then ∑ C An is convergent with :

∑ C An =C ∑ An (n from 1 to infinity) .. why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What exactly is your question?
 
  • #3
Well if you know the rigorous definition of convergence of series than the property is easy to prove.
 
  • #4
write with s_n the partial sum of the first series that you are supposing that converges. We know that if it converges then the limit of its partial sum must exist and me finite. After that write with s'_n the partial sum of the second series, it obviously is equal to
s'_n=cs_n by taking the limit of this too, you can easily prove what you are looking for.
Do u understadn how to do it now?? This is only one way of doing it though.
 
  • #5
Yes, that's correct. [itex]\sum_{n=0}^\infty CA_n[/itex] is defined as the limit of the partial sums: [itex]\sum_{n=0}^\infty CA_n= \lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} \sum_{n=0}^N CA_n[/itex]. For each partial sum, the distributive law gives [itex]\sum_{n=0}^N CA_n= C\sum_{n=0}^N A_n[/itex] and, of course, [itex]\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} C\sum_{n=0}^N A_n= C\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} C\sum_{n=0}^N A_n[/itex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
thanks...hehe i did wrong...
 
  • #7
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, that's correct. [itex]\sum_{n=0}^\infty CA_n[/itex] is defined as the limit of the partial sums: [itex]\sum_{n=0}^\infty CA_n= \lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} \sum_{n=0}^N CA_n[/itex]. For each partial sum, the distributive law gives [itex]\sum_{n=0}^N CA_n= C\sum_{n=0}^N A_n[/itex] and, of course, [itex]\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} C\sum_{n=0}^N A_n= C\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} C\sum_{n=0}^N A_n= \sum_{n=0}^\infty A_n[/itex].
yeah halls at the very end meant this:

[tex]C\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} \sum_{n=0}^N A_n= C\sum_{n=0}^\infty A_n[/itex]

but i am sure it was a typo, latex thing.
 

FAQ: ∑ C An =C ∑ An (n from 1 to infinity) ... why?

What is the meaning of the equation "∑ C An =C ∑ An (n from 1 to infinity) ... why?"

The equation "∑ C An =C ∑ An (n from 1 to infinity) ... why?" is a mathematical expression that represents a summation. The symbol "∑" stands for summation and "n" represents the number of terms being added. The equation is essentially stating that the sum of a constant value (C) multiplied by a series of terms (An) is equal to the constant value (C) multiplied by the sum of the terms (An) from 1 to infinity. The "why" at the end of the equation is asking for an explanation or justification for why this equation holds true.

What is the significance of the "n from 1 to infinity" part of the equation?

The "n from 1 to infinity" part of the equation represents the range of values that are being summed. In other words, it indicates that the terms (An) being added together start at 1 and continue up to infinity. This is important because it shows that the equation is representing an infinite series, rather than a finite one.

Can you provide an example of when this equation would be used in scientific research?

This equation is commonly used in fields such as mathematics, physics, and engineering to represent various mathematical concepts and theories. For example, in physics, this equation can be used to represent the sum of an infinite number of gravitational forces acting on an object in a gravitational field. In mathematics, it can be used to represent infinite series, such as the geometric series.

How does the constant value (C) affect the outcome of the equation?

The constant value (C) in this equation acts as a scaling factor. It can change the magnitude of the sum, but it does not change the overall behavior of the equation. For example, if the value of C is doubled, the sum will also be doubled, but the pattern and relationship between the terms will remain the same.

Is this equation applicable to real-life scenarios or is it purely theoretical?

This equation is applicable to real-life scenarios, as it represents a mathematical concept that can be observed and measured in the physical world. However, it is often used in theoretical contexts to simplify complex systems and make predictions about their behavior. In practical applications, this equation may be used to approximate a problem or make calculations more manageable, but it may not always be an exact representation of the real-life scenario.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
460
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
44
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top