Calc 2 - Taylor Expansion Series of x^(1/2)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the Taylor expansion series for the function f(x) = √x at a = 4. The user has calculated the derivatives of f(x) but struggles to identify the pattern in the numerators of the derivatives. They note that the numerators appear to follow a sequence involving odd numbers, specifically 1, 1*1, 1*1*3, and so forth. Another participant clarifies that the numerators relate to the double factorial of odd numbers, which is defined recursively. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing these patterns in Taylor series expansions.
omg4cards
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



f(x) = \sqrt{x}, a = 4

Homework Equations



f(x) = \sumf^{n}(a)/n! (x-a)^{n}

The Attempt at a Solution



f(x) = x^{1/2}
f^{'}(x) = \frac{1}{2}x^{1/2}
f^{2}(x) = -\frac{1}{2}*\frac{1}{2}x^{-3/2}
f^{3}(x) = \frac{1}{2}*\frac{1}{2}*\frac{3}{2}x^{-5/2}
f^{4}(x) = -\frac{1}{2}*\frac{1}{2}*\frac{3}{2}*\frac{5}{2}x^{-7/2}

f^{n}(x) = (-1)^{n+1}*\frac{1}{2}^{n}*x^{-[(2n-1)/2]}*?


The problem I am having here is with identifying the pattern. I am able to describe everything except the numbers in the numerator(1, 1*1, 1*1*3, 1*1*3*5...). Any help is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea why it looks like that...
 
shouldn't the number's in the numerator be (1*-1*-3*-5*...)?
 
I left out the signs to simplify and becaus I already identified the pattern w/ (-1)^(n+1)... so if i kept the signs in, the #'s in the numerator would be (1, -1*1, -3*-1*1, -5*-3*-1*1)
 
how are you trying to explain it then?
 
n! denotes the double factorial of n and is defined recursively for odd numbers,,
eg: 9! = 1 × 3 × 5 × 7 × 9 = 945

does that help?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K