Calculate Brick Velocity & Draw Displacement-Time Graph

In summary: I apologize, I meant to input 10 ms^-1 for the units, not J. My mistake. In summary, we can calculate the velocity of the brick at the bottom of the inclined plane by equating the initial potential energy to the final kinetic energy. The assumption we make is that there is no friction on the smooth gutter. The resulting velocity is approximately 9.9045 m/s. The displacement-time graph for the brick's movement along the gutter would have a constant acceleration and deceleration, with a linear increase in speed until the end of the slope, followed by a constant speed until it reaches the bottom. The displacement graph would show a similar pattern, with a linear increase in displacement as the brick moves down the gutter.
  • #1
mathlearn
331
0
View attachment 6143

Calculate the velocity of the brick at the bottom of the inclined plane.

State the assumption you made for your calculation in part above.

& Sketch the displacement-time graph relevant to the movement of the brick along the smooth gutter. (Assume that the brick started to move from the state of rest.)

Workings:

I am unable to think on the first two but I think the displacement and time graph should be something like ,

View attachment 6144

Many Thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • Untitlesadd.png
    Untitlesadd.png
    4.4 KB · Views: 104
  • Untitlesadd.png
    Untitlesadd.png
    642 bytes · Views: 108
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
To calculate the velocity of the brick at the bottom of the gutter, I would take the statement that the gutter is smooth to mean there is no friction, and so conservation of energy can be applied. When the brick is at the top of the gutter, it has gravitational potential energy, and since it begins from rest it has no kinetic energy. Then when the brick is at the bottom of the gutter it has kinetic energy, but no gravitational energy. The amount of energy stays the same, but it changes from potential energy to kinetic energy.

So, if we equate the initial potential energy to the final kinetic energy, we have:

\(\displaystyle mgh=\frac{1}{2}mv^2\)

What do you get upon solving for $v$?
 
  • #3
MarkFL said:
To calculate the velocity of the brick at the bottom of the gutter, I would take the statement that the gutter is smooth to mean there is no friction, and so conservation of energy can be applied. When the brick is at the top of the gutter, it has gravitational potential energy, and since it begins from rest it has no kinetic energy. Then when the brick is at the bottom of the gutter it has kinetic energy, but no gravitational energy. The amount of energy stays the same, but it changes from potential energy to kinetic energy.

So, if we equate the initial potential energy to the final kinetic energy, we have:

\(\displaystyle mgh=\frac{1}{2}mv^2\)

What do you get upon solving for $v$?

Thank you very much MarkFL (Party)(Smile)

\(\displaystyle mgh=\frac{1}{2}mv^2\)

\(\displaystyle 2kg * 10 ms^-2 * 5 m=\frac{1}{2}mv^2\)

\(\displaystyle 2kg * 10 ms^-2 * 5 m=\frac{1}{2}*2kg * v^2\)

\(\displaystyle 2kg * 10 ms^-2 * 5 m=\frac{1}{2}*2kg * v^2\)

\(\displaystyle 100 J= v^2\)

\(\displaystyle 10 J= v\)

Correct ? :)
 
  • #4
I would solve the equation first, and then plug in the numbers:

\(\displaystyle mgh=\frac{1}{2}mv^2\)

\(\displaystyle v=\sqrt{2gh}\)

Okay, at this point we can plug in:

\(\displaystyle g\approx9.81\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2},\,h=5\text{ m}\)

\(\displaystyle v\approx\sqrt{2\left(9.81\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2}\right)\left(5\text{ m}\right)}=3\sqrt{\frac{109}{10}}\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}}\approx9.9045\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}}\)
 
  • #5
MarkFL said:
I would solve the equation first, and then plug in the numbers:

\(\displaystyle mgh=\frac{1}{2}mv^2\)

\(\displaystyle v=\sqrt{2gh}\)

Okay, at this point we can plug in:

\(\displaystyle g\approx9.81\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2},\,h=5\text{ m}\)

\(\displaystyle v\approx\sqrt{2\left(9.81\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2}\right)\left(5\text{ m}\right)}=3\sqrt{\frac{109}{10}}\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}}\approx9.9045\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}}\)

Thank you very much :D

:D speaking about the graph

mathlearn said:
Sketch the displacement-time graph relevant to the movement of the brick along the smooth gutter. (Assume that the brick started to move from the state of rest.)

View attachment 6145

Is the above drawn graph correct?
 

Attachments

  • Untitlesadd.png
    Untitlesadd.png
    642 bytes · Views: 91
Last edited:
  • #6
For the graph, you have the brick returning to its original position, since the ending value is zero. Also, the acceleration will be constant as it moves down the gutter, so what kind of curve should we use?
 
  • #7
mathlearn said:
speaking about the graph

Is the above drawn graph correct?

Hey mathlearn! ;)

Here's what the acceleration and speed graphs would look like (using our new TikZ drawing capabilities :cool:):
\begin{tikzpicture}[ultra thick]
\draw[red] (0,5) node[above] {\Large $a$} -- (5,5) -- (5,0) -- (10,0);
\draw[blue] (0,0) node[above] {\Large $v$} -- (5,3) -- (10,3);
\end{tikzpicture}
On the inclined plane we have a constant acceleration, and when it ends, the acceleration becomes near zero.
As a result the speed increases linearly until the end of the slope, after which the speed remains constant (although in reality it would linearly decrease slowly until zero).
Note that $v=\int_0^t a\,dt$.

However, we're asked for the displacement, which we can call $d$.
We have that $d=\int_0^t v\,dt$.
What would the displacement graph look like? (Wondering)
 
  • #8
mathlearn said:
\(\displaystyle 100 J= v^2\)

\(\displaystyle 10 J= v\)
Recheck your units, speed is not measured in J. (And the square root of a J is not J!)

-Dan
 
  • #9
MarkFL said:
For the graph, you have the brick returning to its original position, since the ending value is zero. Also, the acceleration will be constant as it moves down the gutter, so what kind of curve should we use?

View attachment 6147

This kind of a curve :) with constant acceleration and with deceleration.

I like Serena said:
Hey mathlearn! ;)

Here's what the acceleration and speed graphs would look like (using our new TikZ drawing capabilities :cool:):
\begin{tikzpicture}[ultra thick]
\draw[red] (0,5) node[above] {\Large $a$} -- (5,5) -- (5,0) -- (10,0);
\draw[blue] (0,0) node[above] {\Large $v$} -- (5,3) -- (10,3);
\end{tikzpicture}
On the inclined plane we have a constant acceleration, and when it ends, the acceleration becomes near zero.
As a result the speed increases linearly until the end of the slope, after which the speed remains constant (although in reality it would linearly decrease slowly until zero).
Note that $v=\int_0^t a\,dt$.

However, we're asked for the displacement, which we can call $d$.
We have that $d=\int_0^t v\,dt$.
What would the displacement graph look like? (Wondering)

The displacement time graph would look like the above graph

topsquark said:
Recheck your units, speed is not measured in J. (And the square root of a J is not J!)

-Dan

Thanks for the catch :)
 

Attachments

  • displacement time graph.png
    displacement time graph.png
    998 bytes · Views: 86
Last edited:
  • #10
mathlearn said:
This kind of a curve :) with constant acceleration and with deceleration...

Why do you have the brick returning to zero displacement?
 
  • #11
MarkFL said:
Why do you have the brick returning to zero displacement?

:) Then is the graph without returning to zero displacement

View attachment 6148
 

Attachments

  • displacement time graph.png
    displacement time graph.png
    843 bytes · Views: 88
  • #12
mathlearn said:
:) Then is the graph without returning to zero displacement

For the record, you're assuming that the brick ends up in sand at the bottom of the slope, coming to an abrupt stand still.
The corresponding graphs then look like:
\begin{tikzpicture}[font=\LARGE]
\draw[thick, gray, ->] (0,0) -- (9,0) node
{$t$};
\draw[thick, gray, ->] (0,-6) -- (0,4.5);
\draw[ultra thick, red] (0,2) node
{$a$} -- (5,2) -- (5,-6) -- (6,-6) -- (6,0) -- (8,0);
\draw[ultra thick, blue] (0,0) -- (5,4) -- (6,0) -- (8,0) node[above] {$v$};
\draw[ultra thick, olive] (0,0) parabola (5,3) parabola bend (6,3.6) (6,3.6) -- (8,3.6) node
{$d$};
\end{tikzpicture}
(Just had to make the TikZ drawing. :cool:)​
 

FAQ: Calculate Brick Velocity & Draw Displacement-Time Graph

1. How do you calculate brick velocity?

To calculate brick velocity, you need to know the distance and time it took for the brick to move. The formula for velocity is velocity = distance/time. So, for example, if the brick traveled 10 meters in 5 seconds, the velocity would be 10/5 = 2 meters per second.

2. What is displacement?

Displacement is the distance and direction of an object's change in position from its starting point. It is often represented graphically as a vector with an initial and final position.

3. How do you draw a displacement-time graph?

To draw a displacement-time graph, plot the time values on the x-axis and the displacement values on the y-axis. Then, mark the points on the graph and connect them with a straight line. The slope of the line represents the velocity of the object.

4. What is the relationship between velocity and displacement on a graph?

The slope of a displacement-time graph represents the velocity of an object. The steeper the slope, the greater the velocity. Additionally, the area under the graph represents the displacement of the object. A larger area indicates a greater displacement.

5. Why is it important to calculate brick velocity and draw a displacement-time graph?

Calculating brick velocity and drawing a displacement-time graph allows us to visualize the motion of the brick and determine its speed and direction. This information can be useful in understanding the behavior of objects in motion and making predictions about their future movements.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top