MHB Calculate the area of a triangle knowing its 3 heights

  • Thread starter Thread starter loquetedigo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Triangle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the area of a triangle using its three heights, specifically ha = 3 m, hb = 4 m, and hc = 5 m. Participants are prompted to consider the use of Heron's formula and the semi-sum of the reciprocals of the altitudes to derive the area. The area is estimated to be around 10.03 m² to 10.05 m², with a note that using an online calculator like TrianCal can assist in visualizing the results. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical relationships between the triangle's heights and its area. Accurate calculations are essential for determining the correct area based on the given heights.
loquetedigo
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Calculate the area of a triangle knowing its 3 heights

ha = 3 m
hb = 4 m
hc = 5 m

NOTE = You can use the online triangle calculator TrianCal to see and draw the results.
NOTE = Do not use the values ??of responses.

A) 10.03 m2
B) 10.04 m2
C) 10.05 m2
D) Imposible
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
greg1313 said:
Can you apply Heron's formula?
thanks...
Next, denoting the altitudes from sides a, b, and c respectively as ha, hb, and hc, and denoting the semi-sum of the reciprocals of the altitudes as H = (h_a^{-1} + h_b^{-1} + h_c^{-1})/2 we have[11]

A^{-1} = 4 \sqrt{H(H-h_a^{-1})(H-h_b^{-1})(H-h_c^{-1})}.
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top