Calculate the induced EMF of a rotating loop

In summary: To get the sign too, you would need to use trigonometry — and the angle.So if you need the emf at some specific angle, you can’t use the amplitude. And you can’t use ωNBA either. You have to go back to the basic formula: ξ = -N(dΦ/dt).That’s what BvU is telling you. The formula ξ = ωNBA is a special case, for when the angle is such that the emf is at maximum. You were right when you wrote “the instantaneous emf is the amplitude, or ωNBA”. But only for that special case.
  • #1
dainceptionman_02
18
4
Homework Statement
A rectangular loop (area = 0.15m^2) turns in a uniform magnetic field, B=0.20T. When the angle between the field and the normal to the plane of the loop is π/2 rad and increasing at 0.60rad/s, what emf is induced in the loop?
Relevant Equations
ξ=-N(dΦ/dt), Φ=BAcosθ
there are a bunch of problems in this section that ask similar questions, but they ask the amplitude and this doesn't. this is an even problem so i do not have the answer, but my hunch is that it is not an amplitude question. i solved for the amplitude so i am guessing i got this one wrong.

ξ=-N(dΦ/dt) = -NBA(d/dt)(cosθ) = -NBA(-sinθ)dθ/dt, where dθ/dt=ω, which is 0.60rad/s.

the problem states that initially the angle between the field and the normal to the plane is π/2 rad and increasing at 0.60rad/s, which should mean that initially the flux is zero, because Φ=BAcosθ=BAcos(π/2)=0

now, the amplitude, or the maximum emf induced in the loop is ωNBA = (0.60rad/s)(1)(0.20T)(0.15m^2) = 0.018V, but like i said, i think they are asking something else, but i don't know what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi,
:welcome: !​

dainceptionman_02 said:
Homework Statement:: A rectangular loop (area = 0.15m^2) turns in a uniform magnetic field, B=0.20T. When the angle between the field and the normal to the plane of the loop is π/2 rad and increasing at 0.60rad/s, what emf is induced in the loop?
Relevant Equations:: ξ=-N(dΦ/dt), Φ=BAcosθ

i think they are asking something else
They are asking the instantaneous emf, for which you have a relevant equation with all factors known ...

[edit] Oh, and: when in doubt, make a sketch :wink: !

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics, dainceptionman_02, SammyS and 1 other person
  • #3
BvU said:
They are asking the instantaneous emf, for which you have a relevant equation with all factors known ...

[edit] Oh, and: when in doubt, make a sketch :wink: !
i have never seen this before! what do i do, or how do i set it up? thanks!
 
  • #4
You already did !
dainceptionman_02 said:
ξ=-N(dΦ/dt) = -NBA(d/dt)(cosθ) = -NBA(-sinθ)dθ/dt
with all factors known
 
  • #5
BvU said:
You already did !

with all factors known
so the instantaneous emf is the amplitude, or ωNBA?
 
  • #6
Make a sketch to understand why :wink: !
 
  • Like
Likes dainceptionman_02
  • #7
dainceptionman_02 said:
so the instantaneous emf is the amplitude, or ωNBA?
What do you think is this ξ in the formula shown by BvU? You seem to know it too.
 
  • #8
I'd like to add a few words to what @BvU has already said.

dainceptionman_02 said:
so the instantaneous emf is the amplitude, or ωNBA?
EDIT: amplitude = ωNBA. But instantaneous emf means something else.

That's not true in general. (It can be true in special cases.)

When a coil rotates in a magnetic field, the emf produced varies with time. At different times (different angles) during a rotation, the emf can be positive or negative or zero. For a steady angular speed, a graph of emf against time is a sine curve.

The amplitude is the maximum value of |emf|; it is given by ωNBA for a simple setup.

That means if you want the value of emf at some arbitrary moment of time (some arbitrary angle) you can’t use ωNBA.

Of course if the particular angle of interest is, by coincidence, an angle where |emf| is maximum, then ωNBA gives you |emf| but not the sign (+ or -) of the emf.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dainceptionman_02 and TSny

Related to Calculate the induced EMF of a rotating loop

What is the formula to calculate the induced EMF in a rotating loop?

The formula to calculate the induced EMF (Electromotive Force) in a rotating loop is given by Faraday's Law of Induction: EMF = -dΦ/dt, where Φ is the magnetic flux. For a loop rotating in a uniform magnetic field, this can be expressed as EMF = NBAωsin(ωt), where N is the number of turns in the loop, B is the magnetic field strength, A is the area of the loop, ω is the angular velocity, and t is time.

How does the orientation of the loop affect the induced EMF?

The orientation of the loop significantly affects the induced EMF. When the plane of the loop is perpendicular to the magnetic field, the magnetic flux through the loop is maximized, and thus the rate of change of flux is greatest when the loop is rotating, leading to a higher induced EMF. Conversely, when the plane of the loop is parallel to the magnetic field, the flux is minimal, and the induced EMF is reduced.

What role does the angular velocity play in the induced EMF of a rotating loop?

Angular velocity (ω) plays a crucial role in determining the induced EMF in a rotating loop. The induced EMF is directly proportional to the angular velocity. This means that as the angular velocity of the rotating loop increases, the induced EMF also increases. This relationship is evident in the formula EMF = NBAωsin(ωt).

How does the number of turns in the loop affect the induced EMF?

The number of turns (N) in the loop directly affects the induced EMF. The induced EMF is proportional to the number of turns in the loop. Therefore, increasing the number of turns in the loop will result in a higher induced EMF, as shown in the formula EMF = NBAωsin(ωt).

Can the induced EMF in a rotating loop be negative?

Yes, the induced EMF in a rotating loop can be negative. The sign of the induced EMF depends on the direction of the change in magnetic flux through the loop. According to Lenz's Law, the induced EMF will always act in a direction to oppose the change in flux. This opposition can result in a negative value for the induced EMF, depending on the direction of rotation and the orientation of the magnetic field.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
88
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top