Calculate Torque: Planking on Pool Ladder Rail - Physics

  • Thread starter Megaevelie
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Physics
In summary: Solve for F2F2 = 162.8 lbs x 29.5 cm / 59 cmF2 = 81.4 lbsSo, F1 = 81.4 lbs also.Therefore, the sum of the forces acting on my teammate is 162.8 lbs which is equal to her weight and the equilibrium is achieved.In summary, the team was assigned to do a planking experiment to demonstrate equilibrium by computing torque. They chose a pool ladder rail and one member who weighs 74 kilos and is 5'1" tall. The pool ladder rails are 1 m above the ground. The equation for torque is Torque=Force x momentum arm. The team used the equilibrium condition that
  • #1
Megaevelie
16
0
We were assigned to do a planking and then prove why it is in equilibrium by computing its torque, etc. We selected the pool ladder rail to do the planking. Our team member who did the planking weighs 74 kilos and 5'1" tall. The pool ladder rails are 1 m above the ground. Torque=Force x momentum arm.

I am confused about how to apply the first and second condition of equilibrium.

How do I get the forces acted by the pool ladder rails on the my teammate?

Are there any other forces acting downward on my teammate aside from her weight?

My attempts:

ΣT = Fx1 + Fx2 + Fx3 ...

ΣT = (1.5548780488 m x 162.8 lbs)+(F x 1 m)+(F x 1 m)

Is this correct?

Thank you so much!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I have never "planked" anyone or anything so I don't know what you are talking about. I gather that this is an equilibrium problem and the solution to it should be standard. A diagram should be very useful in helping us to help you.
 
  • #3
kuruman said:
I have never "planked" anyone or anything so I don't know what you are talking about. I gather that this is an equilibrium problem and the solution to it should be standard. A diagram should be very useful in helping us to help you.

I do not know how to make a diagram but here is the link of our taken photo for our assignment:
http://hippomonstro.tumblr.com/post/8907741055/planking-for-physics

I hope this helps. Thanks! :)
 
  • #4
Megaevelie said:
I do not know how to make a diagram but here is the link of our taken photo for our assignment:
http://hippomonstro.tumblr.com/post/8907741055/planking-for-physics

I hope this helps. Thanks! :)

Aaaah, planking! :smile:

For your torque you won't need the height of the rungs, but the distance between them.

Furthermore, you should (first) use the equilibrium condition that says that the sum of the vertical forces is zero.
 
  • #5
I like Serena said:
Aaaah, planking! :smile:

For your torque you won't need the height of the rungs, but the distance between them.

Oh, yeah I remember. You are right. Thank you for that! :smile:
 
  • #6
I like Serena said:
Furthermore, you should (first) use the equilibrium condition that says that the sum of the vertical forces is zero.

Ah, so R(resultant vector) - lbs(weight of my teammate) - F(Force of the pool ladders) = 0

Therefore, I have to solve for the F first which is

F = R-lbs?

Is this correct? I'm so confused.
 
  • #7
R(resultant vector) must be zero, otherwise your teammate would move vertically.
So the sum of the 2 forces of the pool rungs must be equal to the weight of your teammate.
 
  • #8
I like Serena said:
R(resultant vector) must be zero, otherwise your teammate would move vertically.
So the sum of the 2 forces of the pool rungs must be equal to the weight of your teammate.

I tried to figure this out and this is what I have come up with:

Since the R and the F of the pool rungs are unknown, I cannot solve for the first condition of equilibrium. So, I used torque to solve for the forces.

(assuming the values are correct)

ΣT = Fx1 + Fx2 + Fx3 ...

ΣT = (1.5548780488 m x lbs)+(F x 1 m)+(F x 1 m)
= (253.13414634464 m.lbs)+(F x 1 m) + (F x 1m)
(253.13414634464 m.lbs)/(1M x 1M) = (F x 1 m) + (F x 1m)/(1M x 1M)
(253.13414634464 m.lbs)/(1M x 1M) = (F x 1 m) + (F x 1m)/(1M x 1M)
(253.13414634464) = F + F

Will I just divide 253.13414634464 into half?
 
  • #9
Hmm, let's define F1 as the force exerted by the one rung, and F2 the force exerted by the other rung.
Furthermore let W be the weight of your teammate.
All these forces are vertically oriented.

Let the distance between the 2 rungs be "d".
And let the distance between the first rung and the center of mass of your teammate be "c".

Equilibrium means: ΣFy = 0: F1 + F2 - W = 0

Furthermore for the moment sum, we need to pick a fixed reference point.
Let's take the first rung as reference point.

Then: ΣT = 0: F1 x 0 - W x c + F2 x d = 0

If you know W, c, and d, you can deduce F1 and F2.
 
  • #10
I like Serena said:
Hmm, let's define F1 as the force exerted by the one rung, and F2 the force exerted by the other rung.
Furthermore let W be the weight of your teammate.
All these forces are vertically oriented.

Let the distance between the 2 rungs be "d".
And let the distance between the first rung and the center of mass of your teammate be "c".

Equilibrium means: ΣFy = 0: F1 + F2 - W = 0

Furthermore for the moment sum, we need to pick a fixed reference point.
Let's take the first rung as reference point.

Then: ΣT = 0: F1 x 0 - W x c + F2 x d = 0

If you know W, c, and d, you can deduce F1 and F2.

I did the equation you have posted and here is what I got:

ΣT = F1 x 0 - W x c + F2 x d = 0
I canceled out "F1 x 0" since it is equal to zero.

So, ΣT = - W x c + F2 x d = 0

My value for W=162.8 lbs, for d = 59 cm and for c = 29.5 cm (I divided the d to get this value). Substituting these:

ΣT = - 162.8 lbs x 29.5 cm + F2 x 59 cm = 0
- F2 x 59 cm = - 162.8 lbs x 29.5 cm
- F2 x 59 cm = - 4802.6 lbs.cm
- F2 x 59 cm/59 cm = - 4802.6 lbs.cm/59 cm
- F2 = - 81.4 lbs

So, F2 = 81.4

To get the F1, the placed the zero in d, and placed the value of d in 0 in ΣT = 0: F1 x 0 - W x c + F2 x d = 0.

I also got 81.4 for F1.

Having all of these values,

ΣT = T1 + T2 + T3
ΣT = (81.4 lbs x 59 cm) + (81.4 lbs x 59 cm) - (162.8 lbs x 29.5 cm) = 4802.6

I did not get a zero value for torque, but the force acting downwards - the forces acting upward is equal to zero.

What is 4802.6? Is my solution wrong?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Megaevelie said:
I did the equation you have posted and here is what I got:

ΣT = F1 x 0 - W x c + F2 x d = 0
I canceled out "F1 x 0" since it is equal to zero.

So, ΣT = - W x c + F2 x d = 0

My value for W=162.8 lbs, for d = 59 cm and for c = 29.5 cm (I divided the d to get this value). Substituting these:

ΣT = - 162.8 lbs x 29.5 cm + F2 x 59 cm = 0
- F2 x 59 cm = - 162.8 lbs x 29.5 cm
- F2 x 59 cm = - 4802.6 lbs.cm
- F2 x 59 cm/59 cm = - 4802.6 lbs.cm/59 cm
- F2 = - 81.4 lbs

So, F2 = 81.4

Good! :smile:


Megaevelie said:
To get the F1, the placed the zero in d, and placed the value of d in 0 in ΣT = 0: F1 x 0 - W x c + F2 x d = 0.

I also got 81.4 for F1.

Having all of these values,

ΣT = T1 + T2 + T3
ΣT = (81.4 lbs x 59 cm) + (81.4 lbs x 59 cm) - (162.8 lbs x 29.5 cm) = 4802.6

I did not get a zero value for torque, but the force acting downwards - the forces acting upward is equal to zero.

What is 4802.6? Is my solution wrong?

No, this is not the way to go.
You should use the other equilibrium equation for ΣFy to deduce F1...

Furthermore you already used up the torque formula.
You have calculated the moments with respect to the left rung.
That comes out as zero and that's that.
You're not supposed to recycle it and put other numbers into it.
 
  • #12
I like Serena said:
No, this is not the way to go.
You should use the other equilibrium equation for ΣFy to deduce F1...

Furthermore you already used up the torque formula.
You have calculated the moments with respect to the left rung.
That comes out as zero and that's that.
You're not supposed to recycle it and put other numbers into it.

Thank you! :biggrin:

So the next step would be

R - W - F1 - F2 = 0?

What is the other equilibrium equation for ΣFy to deduce F1?
 
  • #13
Megaevelie said:
Thank you! :biggrin:

So the next step would be

R - W - F1 - F2 = 0?

What is the other equilibrium equation for ΣFy to deduce F1?

Nooooo. As I said before R = 0. :rolleyes:

Your equation is W - F1 - F2 = 0.
 
  • #14
Therefore, 163.8 - 84.1 - 84.1 = 0

So I no longer need to compute for the resultant vector? :D
 
  • #15
You keep reintroducing R. What exactly do you think this resultant vector is?
 
  • #16
I was just confused. :frown:

but anyway, thank you for the help. God bless. :smile:
 
  • #17
Megaevelie said:
Therefore, 163.8 - 84.1 - 84.1 = 0

Hmm, I though your teammate had a different weight.
I also thought you had calculated a different value for F2.
And finally, what you just wrote does not add up to 0. :confused:

Megaevelie said:
So I no longer need to compute for the resultant vector? :D

I guess not, unless you have some nifty way to calculate zero! :biggrin:
 

FAQ: Calculate Torque: Planking on Pool Ladder Rail - Physics

What is torque?

Torque is a measure of the turning or twisting force applied to an object. It is calculated by multiplying the force applied to the object by the distance from the axis of rotation to the point where the force is applied.

How do you calculate torque?

To calculate torque, you need to know the force applied to the object and the distance from the axis of rotation to the point where the force is applied. You then multiply the force by the distance to get the torque value.

What is the equation for torque?

The equation for torque is T = F * r, where T is torque, F is force, and r is the distance from the axis of rotation to the point where the force is applied.

How does planking on a pool ladder rail affect torque?

Planking on a pool ladder rail can increase the torque on the rail because the force of the person's body weight is applied at a greater distance from the axis of rotation (the rail). This means that the torque generated by the person's body weight is greater, putting more stress on the rail.

How can the torque on a pool ladder rail be reduced?

The torque on a pool ladder rail can be reduced by decreasing the distance between the force (the person's body weight) and the axis of rotation (the rail). This can be achieved by keeping the person's body close to the rail while planking, or by using a wider or sturdier rail to distribute the force over a larger area.

Similar threads

Back
Top