Calculating acceleration using Experimental equation

In summary: The only reason I was trying to guess what x might be is that I was trying to guess what 10-.1117 might be, and I was guessing it might be close to 1. But it turns out it does not matter.
  • #1
Artel
6
0

Homework Statement


Determine the y intercept and slope of the linearization equation of the graph. Find an experimental equation. From this and the theoretical equation given in the introduction, determine the acceleration on the object.

Context: I recorded data for the distance vs velocity of an object. With that distance, I plotted it a graph and found the linearization equation to it.

Homework Equations


The theoretical equation relating distance and velocity:
v = [itex]\sqrt{2a}[/itex]Δx1/2

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the log10 x = log10 y and x = lny graphs of my data.
The log10 x = log10 y graph has the best R2 value, so I will use this in finding my experimental equation.
According to excel, the linearization equation is
y = .5018x - .1117
with R2 being .9999
According to my question, I have to convert this to an experimental equation.
Experimental equation for power function is: y = bxm

What I don't know how to do is, 1. Converting it to an experimental equation and 2. Finding the acceleration of the object.

My attempt at converting:
y = 10-.1117*x.5018

As to determining the acceleration of the glider from this using the experimental and theoretical equation, I have no idea how.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to Physics Forums.

The idea is to compare the equations:
[tex]\begin{align}
v & = \sqrt{2a} \cdot \Delta x^{1/2} \\
\text{and} &\\
y & = 10^{-.1117} \cdot x^{.5018}
\end{align}[/tex]
From looking at those two equations, it is evident that
[tex]\sqrt{2a} = \text{ _____?}[/tex]
 
  • #3
Thank you for responding!

Alright, comparing the two equations:
I set both equations equal to each other.

[itex]\sqrt{2a}[/itex] = 10-.1117 • x.5018/x1/2

[itex]\sqrt{2a}[/itex] = .773215 x.0018

squaring both sides

2a = .597861 x.0036

dividing by 2

a = .298931 x.0036

I still don't understand. I have a value for a, but it is dependent on x. What does this mean? Isn't acceleration a constant?
 
  • #4
When you are plotting data, and obtain a fit, you will get a list of parameters.
In your case, you plotted y=b*xm and obtained values for b and m,b = 10-0.1117 and m = 0.508.
Your next step is to compare your data (b and m) to the expected values ([itex]\sqrt{2a}[/itex] and 1/2).
The important part of this is to recognize that you are not comparing the experimental equation b*xm to the theoretical [itex]\sqrt{2a}[/itex]*x1/2, but b to [itex]\sqrt{2a}[/itex] and m to 1/2.
 
  • #5
How do I compare b to [itex]\sqrt{2a}[/itex] and m to 1/2 and find a? What do you mean by compare?
 
  • #6
Artel said:
a = .298931 x.0036

I still don't understand. I have a value for a, but it is dependent on x. What does this mean? Isn't acceleration a constant?

Yes, acceleration should be a constant.

The fact that your best fit line gives x.5018 instead of x.5000 can be attributed to experimental error. So x.5018 is essentially (approximately) equal to x1/2, and you may treat them as canceling out where you had x.5018/x1/2 in your work.

EDIT: you may ignore the rest of this post, it is probably just going to confuse the issue...

Or looked at another way ...

Assuming you are using meters for x and m/s for v, I would bet that your x-values are mostly somewhere between 0.1 m and 10 m. How would this change the value of a in

a = .298931 x.0036 ?​

I.e., what is 10.0036, and what is 0.1.0036?
 
Last edited:
  • #7
frogjg2003 said:
The important part of this is to recognize that you are not comparing the experimental equation b*xm to the theoretical [itex]\sqrt{2a}[/itex]*x1/2, but b to [itex]\sqrt{2a}[/itex] and m to 1/2.

Artel said:
How do I compare b to [itex]\sqrt{2a}[/itex] and m to 1/2 and find a? What do you mean by compare?
He means:

1. Compare b to [itex]\sqrt{2a}[/itex]

and

2. Compare m to 1/2

So there are two separate, independent comparisons to make.

Also, this all assumes consistent length and time units for x, v, and a. For example meters and seconds everywhere (or cm and seconds would work too).
 
  • #8
Yes, in that case x is very close to 1. So my a is .298931, which is an acceptable result. Thank you!
 
  • #9
The value of a does not depend on x.
When I said compare, i mean set equal to each other.
Like Redbelly98 said, 1/2 is pretty close to .5018, probably within your experimental error, so you get 1/2≈.5018
The important part is that you set [itex]\sqrt{2a}=10^{-.1117}[/itex] and solve for a.
No need to assume x is 1 or close to 1 or any other value.
 

FAQ: Calculating acceleration using Experimental equation

How do you calculate acceleration using the experimental equation?

To calculate acceleration using the experimental equation, you will need to measure the initial and final velocities of an object and the time it takes for the object to change its velocity. Then, you can use the equation a = (vf - vi)/t, where "a" is acceleration, "vf" is final velocity, "vi" is initial velocity, and "t" is time.

What is the experimental equation used for?

The experimental equation is used to calculate acceleration, which is the rate of change of an object's velocity. This equation is commonly used in physics and other scientific fields to study the motion of objects.

Can the experimental equation be used to calculate acceleration for all types of motion?

Yes, the experimental equation can be used to calculate acceleration for all types of motion, including linear, circular, and projectile motion. However, the values for initial and final velocities may differ depending on the type of motion being studied.

How does the experimental equation differ from the theoretical equation for acceleration?

The experimental equation for acceleration is based on actual measurements of an object's velocity and time, while the theoretical equation is derived from mathematical principles and assumes ideal conditions. The experimental equation may have some errors due to experimental limitations, while the theoretical equation is considered to be more precise.

What are some common sources of error when using the experimental equation to calculate acceleration?

Some common sources of error when using the experimental equation to calculate acceleration include human error in measuring the initial and final velocities and time, external factors such as air resistance or friction, and limitations of the measuring tools used. It is important to carefully control these factors to obtain accurate results.

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top