Calculating Electric Field of Insulating Spherical Shell

In summary, to calculate the electric field at the center of an insulating hemispherical shell with radius R and a uniform surface charge density, integration is necessary since Gauss's Law cannot be used. The hemisphere can be broken up into rings of charge, with the width of each ring being Rdθ and the radius being R cos(θ). The area of each ring is 2∏R(cos(θ))(Rdθ). To incorporate the surface charge density, use the equation dQ = σ (2∏R)cos(θ)(Rdθ). The x and y components of the electric field cancel out, leaving only the z-component, which can be found using Coulomb's Law multiplied by sin(θ).
  • #1
nosmas
7
0
Calculationg the electric field of an insulating sperical shell using integration?

Homework Statement



We are asked to calculate the electric field at the center of an insulating hemispherical shell with radius R and a uniform surface charge density using integration.



Homework Equations


Gauss's law
E*A = Qencl/epsilon

dE = k(dQ/r^2) where k=1/(4pi*epsilon)


The Attempt at a Solution



I assume we can't use gauss's law since it asks for integration so I tried treating it as a ring of charge using dE = k(dQ/r^2)

dQ = lamda * dS
dS = rd(theta)
dQ = lamda * r * d(theta)

dE = k((lamda * d(theta))/r)(cos(theta) i + sin (theta) j)

and integrating from there but i don't believe it can be treated as a ring of charge.

Any suggestions??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


nosmas said:

Homework Statement



We are asked to calculate the electric field at the center of an insulating hemispherical shell with radius R and a uniform surface charge density using integration.

Homework Equations


Gauss's law
E*A = Qencl/epsilon

dE = k(dQ/r^2) where k=1/(4pi*epsilon)

The Attempt at a Solution



I assume we can't use gauss's law since it asks for integration so I tried treating it as a ring of charge using dE = k(dQ/r^2)

dQ = lamda * dS
dS = rd(theta)
dQ = lamda * r * d(theta)

dE = k((lamda * d(theta))/r)(cos(theta) i + sin (theta) j)

and integrating from there but i don't believe it can be treated as a ring of charge.

Any suggestions??

Hello nosmas. Welcome to PF !

There's not enough symmetry yo use Gauss's Law.

You should start by defining θ.

Shouldn't you be using σ (sigma) for surface charge density ? ... or are you given The total charge, Q, so that σ = Q/(2πR2) ?

dS = r dθ can't be correct. dS has units of area, r dθ has units of length.

If the hemisphere sits on the xy-plane and is centered at the origin, then the x & y components of the E field cancel, leaving only the z-component.

I does make sense to break the hemisphere up into rings of charge.

Assuming θ is the angle of elevation above the xy-plane, then the width of such a ring is Rdθ. The radius of the ring is R cos(θ) . The area of such a ring is the width times the circumference.

That may get you started in the right direction.
 
  • #3


I should be using σ for the surface charge density I am just not sure how to incorporate it.

So the E field on the hemisphere is equal to the sum of infinetly many rings of charge?

I understand that the width of the ring is Rdθ and the radius of the ring is R cos(θ)

so the area of the ring would be 2∏R(Rdθ) but I don't understand where to use the area?

Using the general equation dE = K*(dQ/r^2) how would i incorporate σ into dQ?

Thanks
 
  • #4


nosmas said:
I should be using σ for the surface charge density I am just not sure how to incorporate it.

So the E field on the hemisphere is equal to the sum of infinitely many rings of charge?

I understand that the width of the ring is Rdθ and the radius of the ring is R cos(θ)

so the area of the ring would be 2∏R(cos(θ))(Rdθ) but I don't understand where to use the area?

Using the general equation dE = K*(dQ/r^2) how would i incorporate σ into dQ?

Thanks
You left cos(θ) out of your expression for the area of a ring. (I inserted it in the above quote.)

Charge = σ × area → dQ = σ dA = σ (2∏R)cos(θ)(Rdθ)

I don't know how you have the hemisphere oriented in your coordinate system, but ... As I said in my previous post: "If the hemisphere sits on the xy-plane and is centered at the origin, then the x & y components of the E field cancel, leaving only the z-component." In fact this is true for the electric field, dE, due to each ring. So, to find dE, use Coulomb's Law multiplied by sin(θ) .

Integrate the result to find E.
 
  • #5




Your approach is correct. The key is to think about the hemispherical shell as a collection of infinitesimal rings of charge, each with its own electric field contribution. By integrating over all of these rings, we can find the total electric field at the center of the shell.

To make the integration easier, we can use symmetry to our advantage. Since the shell is uniform and has a spherical shape, the electric field at the center must also be uniform and point in the radial direction. This means that we can ignore the components of the electric field in the i and j directions, and only focus on the magnitude of the electric field.

We can then use the equation dE = k(dQ/r^2) to calculate the contribution of each ring of charge to the electric field. As you correctly noted, dQ = lambda * r * d(theta), where lambda is the surface charge density and r is the distance from the center of the shell to the ring. We can also express r in terms of theta, using the fact that the shell has a radius of R. This will allow us to write dE in terms of theta alone.

We can then integrate over all values of theta, from 0 to pi/2, to find the total electric field at the center of the shell. The result will be a simple expression involving the surface charge density and the radius of the shell.

In summary, your approach is correct and with the use of symmetry and integration, you will be able to calculate the electric field at the center of the hemispherical shell. Keep up the good work!
 

FAQ: Calculating Electric Field of Insulating Spherical Shell

How do you calculate the electric field of an insulating spherical shell?

To calculate the electric field of an insulating spherical shell, you can use the formula E = (Qr)/4πε0r3, where E is the electric field, Q is the charge on the shell, r is the distance from the center of the shell, and ε0 is the permittivity of free space.

What is the difference between an insulating spherical shell and a conducting spherical shell?

An insulating spherical shell is made of a material that does not allow electric charge to flow through it, while a conducting spherical shell is made of a material that allows electric charge to flow through it. This difference affects how the electric field is calculated, as a conducting shell will have a different charge distribution compared to an insulating shell.

Can the electric field inside an insulating spherical shell be zero?

Yes, the electric field inside an insulating spherical shell can be zero if the charge on the shell is distributed in such a way that the electric field vectors cancel each other out. This typically occurs when there is an equal amount of positive and negative charge on the shell, or when the charge is evenly distributed on the surface of the shell.

How does the electric field change as you move away from the center of an insulating spherical shell?

The electric field decreases as you move away from the center of an insulating spherical shell. This is because the charge on the shell is distributed over a larger surface area as you move away from the center, resulting in a weaker electric field according to the inverse square law.

Can the electric field of an insulating spherical shell be negative?

Yes, the electric field of an insulating spherical shell can be negative. This occurs when the charge on the shell is negative, and the electric field points towards the center of the shell. However, in most cases, the electric field of an insulating shell will be positive since the charge on the shell is usually positive.

Back
Top